1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1TWRpc-0005Nb-5v
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:07:40 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ia0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1TWRpY-00020W-IF
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:07:40 +0000
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id b35so1983071iac.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:07:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.97.8 with SMTP id ci8mr7021357icc.28.1352380051346; Thu, 08
Nov 2012 05:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.171.73 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 05:07:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0LUv69wYwg_6ivPc=mFiGEYKomaJXmmT2Zm14bKik0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T1K+XKr=OT5TC4d1KiQ_kXH+giCWHPiS=t7-NyVOmGTDw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBisYEMWzS5JNXAoB5EeHc=YboOJqsktEqON1dY6Lo2SsA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0LUv69wYwg_6ivPc=mFiGEYKomaJXmmT2Zm14bKik0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:07:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQkKbLXAYDUfwmKumNKdfyT08EJZgHX9qm-VBt36inz6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1TWRpY-00020W-IF
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:07:40 -0000
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> Is it time to feature-freeze 0.8
>
> I'd like more time to get the bloom filtering work in. It'll be easier to
> promote the 0.8 release if we can sell it as "important
> scalability/performance improvement for the network, upgrade to help Bitc=
oin
I agree on getting the bloom filtering stuff in for 0.8, though I
don't think it'll need any marketing at all=E2=80=94 ultraprune speaks for
itself. :P
I'm also concerned about overselling it for miners and merchants when
the ultraprune stuff is such a major change.
Since the current changes will just need a lot of testing and soaking
time which is pretty much independent of RPC and GUI changes it might
be unfortunate to feature freeze those things and then have a long
delay just on QA for the other stuff. I do think we need to talk
about what we think we need to o to get what we have now ready for
release.
|
