1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <marius.hanne@sourceagency.org>) id 1XmMeB-0004qV-HF
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:58:43 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from static.221.89.251.148.clients.your-server.de ([148.251.89.221]
helo=mail.nonymous.org)
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1XmMe9-0005Jg-Ob for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:58:43 +0000
Received: by mail.nonymous.org (Postfix, from userid 106)
id E232CC1E18; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:39:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.nonymous.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from aergia (aftr-88-217-180-160.dynamic.mnet-online.de
[88.217.180.160])
(Authenticated sender: marius.hanne@sourceagency.org)
by mail.nonymous.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B77FBF4D1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:39:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:39:48 +0100
From: Marius Hanne <marius.hanne@sourceagency.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20141106133948.68d64042@aergia>
In-Reply-To: <20141106104509.GA19304@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20141106103820.GA17096@savin.petertodd.org>
<20141106104509.GA19304@savin.petertodd.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Sig_/Uk4oqr_8EhbGoimXj3Ajy7x";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1XmMe9-0005Jg-Ob
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SCRIPT_VERIFY_STRICTENC and CHECKSIG NOT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:58:43 -0000
--Sig_/Uk4oqr_8EhbGoimXj3Ajy7x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 05:45:09 -0500
Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:38:20AM -0500, Peter Todd wrote:
> > So right now git head will accept the following invalid transaction
> > into the mempool:
> >=20
> > 0100000001140de229e08fda25cbc16ded2618cdacce49fcb18c0b6ccdace00040909ad=
ae4000000009000493046022100f7828d81c849c5448ba5ba4ef55df6b4d0ba3ae3f1a59cff=
3291880c2c8e524f022100d2f5bc9dc2f0674eded31023cb47e61a596e10f8f1ddd44cf92d2=
90c9db577c70144410778d430274f8c5ec1321338151e9f27f4c676a008bdf8638d07c0b6be=
9ab35c71a1518063243acd4dfe96b66e3f2ec8013c8e072cd09b3834a19f81f659cc3455ac9=
1ffffffff01102700000000000017a914e661a2229cc824329c9409f49d99cb5ac350c92887=
00000000
> >=20
> > which spends the redeemScript:
> >=20
> > 0778d430274f8c5ec1321338151e9f27f4c676a008bdf8638d07c0b6be9ab35c71a1518=
063243acd4dfe96b66e3f2ec8013c8e072cd09b3834a19f81f659cc3455
> > CHECKSIG NOT
>=20
> ...and while we're at it, bitcoin-ruby's forked yet again...
>=20
It is? How do you reckon? The webbtc node just received a block:
http://webbtc.com/block/0000000000000000006370724f73798f4c00c8da97f675c4dcf=
4605e9882913c
You mean it would be forked off if this change was released?
--Sig_/Uk4oqr_8EhbGoimXj3Ajy7x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlRbbBoACgkQ4z9wa4BINIpSawCgjPLPUVdLQYSph8aP9GymAbZD
r10AoKyuDOrWFZeRur3Lo80Rdr6qfrwT
=dgkJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/Uk4oqr_8EhbGoimXj3Ajy7x--
|
