1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Return-Path: <marco.falke@tum.de>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BA087A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:25:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [129.187.255.138])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D91ED1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3sx0wp1G1jzyVh
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:25:46 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
reason="pass (just generated,
assumed good)" header.d=tum.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h=
content-type:content-type:subject:subject:message-id:date:date
:from:from:references:in-reply-to:received:mime-version:received
:received:received; s=postout; t=1476527145; bh=GMjBvpG8q9NIEsxP
tXmdBUvXJ6IGqSkc5mkl2OhhC58=; b=ysOmUhQiNuoLRzHfoZxDMq2ieGlcfQZs
BnyqEZkHhidm/HOAmXkwlOot1RnrTlP8tN3Q4dMMkWcwzMwhQw/HcLlTOOCFB0q+
8XONPB87CPNQCpEKwq65LhPLs8l0JpGXkMyo5Z9Me3HUeWLeBqE6zYJUABx3h/h5
AOivSXMKYoU/2iDD6iZfUws01KUWxnixYX6xrBAp1M9JfMD2Y0vzied/GvwUCdXh
fQBBTv+TBypRwoUVEgzXLl5KC+G5jWurjdlGLwKQ7uqGXC3MwDGLwDNp77WlnseS
9AJgQGZ8+wjDKuCO8YNMlKbYM/E/BxeDawH+FIyPv/smp4A12sN+ow==
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de
X-Spam-Score: -2.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1])
by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 20024)
with LMTP id 5qq0c38tDi7B for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:25:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3sx0wn1kJyzyVM
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:25:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c78so24112932wme.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmhAP2Lowcvp5bMeMQ+8X7Eb9BQf855rLsCBd4uuzk00PHXUZNSuexlEtI9mRN0jmfBr1kwWqyByxE8Tw==
X-Received: by 10.28.54.209 with SMTP id y78mr1443257wmh.94.1476527144364;
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.1.17 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 03:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2024168.qgaqMetGW1@kiwi>
References: <201609240636.01968.luke@dashjr.org> <2024168.qgaqMetGW1@kiwi>
From: Marco Falke <marco.falke@tum.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:25:43 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAK51vgAeBBd14enaDdhdL+sC2QmYJrwPrFvkRCoUkbvbOAFViA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK51vgAeBBd14enaDdhdL+sC2QmYJrwPrFvkRCoUkbvbOAFViA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:30:04 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 2 revival and rework
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:25:49 -0000
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Tom via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I'd suggest saying that "Share alike" is required and "Attribution" is
> optional.
Please note there is no CC license that requires SA and at the same
time has BY as an option.
Generally, I think CC0 is best suited as license for BIPs. If authors
are scared that they won't get proper attribution, they can choose
MIT/BSD or CC-BY. Other than that I don't think that more restrictive
licenses are suitable for BIPs. The BIP repo seems like the wrong
place to promote Open Access (e.g. by choosing a CC-BY-SA license).
BIP 2 allows such licenses, but does not recommend them, which is
fine.
I think that BIP 2 in its current form (
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki
@6e47447b ) looks good and addressed the feedback which was
accumulated last year. If there are no objections I'd suggest to move
forward with BIP 2 in the next couple of days/weeks.
Marco
|
