summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/09/edc6e9abf447c4b589dffed9436982496d23e3
blob: fe81d3de374a3ad75d7747caa0473e6e47fab5ff (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394B4C0032
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104CE41BF0
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 104CE41BF0
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=HkPINsm1
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id AE0TUpHvzA1h
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-4325.protonmail.ch (mail-4325.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.25])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862A341BCD
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:45:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 862A341BCD
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
 s=protonmail3; t=1695109506; x=1695368706;
 bh=u/XSaPOj6/R6B5cdQf14F0YnguJBrHDjCzeGd3/ZMNo=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
 b=HkPINsm1LpLCUv6qsh7bsoFtTIl3Iw0t+Yr6Fws5jzr2qpYuSceq1ff4PAQBxXpbn
 1VFsgO2uynkMRXHeVa1WQwX1fOI9xMa18QKWxAxekMPpiMNq4k9q9ZDVB35GonTkbn
 DPrXD1aNBhKo9tsbuMTvCpSZHo5J83C0UodRqJUfqOaj6e2Vxk7aWE0IHU4AX9sQ0X
 vaSUGCGmP4ZanLQO0wvaIBhftFOadMXxeuPaE1D7JQKDYvuIvfYNxmzoQJLFD3ptOz
 oRQhoy6udnC2laKRDGtIci5NqXEdpfZMUK1vspThgko1BUHq/co0uH3y/6yuv70G2V
 Fskz1GO13KJHA==
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:44:48 +0000
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <An4gUD9oSgMzt9dGWj7ZhCZ73fWNcQ_c9dya0X0OILJFGijykRNtWc4HClKJ0QGsQjKiL2-Oak7syh_4XngCNFJEVJDhKeEy11nedSpXbpI=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgL+sW_rtO+zaoe=ztia9SfQXCeZ0YnAsmox1O3r3kAAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <vUfA21-18moEP9UiwbWvzpwxxn83yJQ0J4YsnzK4iQGieArfWPpIZblsVs1yxEs9NBpqoMBISuufMsckbuWXZE1qkzXkf36oJKfwDVqQ2as=@protonmail.com>
 <CALZpt+FzVvUay_rANGxAwUtptJFfwUqSyJJib50mFc2JjvJPuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJowKgL+sW_rtO+zaoe=ztia9SfQXCeZ0YnAsmox1O3r3kAAwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 2872618:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
 lightning-dev <lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Lightning With Simple Covenants
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 07:45:11 -0000


Good morning Erik,

> > replacing CTV usage with Musig2
>=20
>=20
> this changes the trust model to a federated one vs trustless and also inc=
reases the on-chain footprint of failure, correct?


As I understand it, no.

MuSig and MuSig2 are n-of-n signing algorithms.

The implied usage is that all entities `A_i` for all `i` and `B` dedicated =
LN node are in the n-of-n set.

The argument that 2-of-2 channels are non-custodial and trust-minimized ext=
ends to n-of-n for all n.

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj