1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F30C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C21D60655
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5C21D60655
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AQBOtOPDU71y
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 9A26860591
Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A26860591
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au (helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au)
by azure.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
id 1ooyFG-0001mm-1n; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 12:40:19 +1000
Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Sun, 30 Oct 2022 12:40:14 +1000
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 12:40:14 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y13kDu5XHtaZVWih@erisian.com.au>
References: <Y1nIKjQC3DkiSGyw@erisian.com.au>
<194063b733e539e8e24cfd83fa879ed0@dtrt.org>
<Y13NM4dyuD6ktvlf@erisian.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y13NM4dyuD6ktvlf@erisian.com.au>
X-Spam-Score-int: -18
X-Spam-Bar: -
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 02:40:22 -0000
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Some napkin math: there are about 250,000 transactions a day; if
> > we round that up to 100 million a year and assume we only want one
> > transaction per year to fail to initially propagate on a network where
> > 30% of nodes have adopted a more permissive policy, lightweight clients
> > will need to connect to over 50 randomly selected nodes.[1]
> A target failure probability of 1-in-1e8 means:
Oh, based on the "receive version message" log entries of a node that
only does outbound connections, over the last ~3 weeks I see about 3000
outbound connections (mostly feelers/block-relay-only ones), of which
a bunch identify as non-taproot supporting:
10 /Satoshi:0.16.0/:
13 /Satoshi:0.17.0/:
13 /Satoshi:0.17.0.1/:
28 /Satoshi:0.16.3/:
29 /Satoshi:0.19.0.1/:
36 /Satoshi:0.18.1/:
37 /Satoshi:0.19.1/:
39 /Satoshi:0.17.1/:
50 /Satoshi:0.20.0/:
94 /Satoshi:0.21.0/:
95 /Satoshi:0.18.0/:
244 /Satoshi:0.20.1/:
Those add up to 688+ of 3065 total; if that's representative, it
presumably means a random node connecting to 8 random listening peers has
a 6.44-in-1-million chance of only connecting to peers that don't support
taproot, ie failing your suggested threshold by a factor of about 644.
Cheers,
aj
|
