1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E72CAE7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:51:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149078.authsmtp.net (outmail149078.authsmtp.net
[62.13.149.78])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2C6E7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:50:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5SJowXT020548
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 20:50:58 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (bas3-cooksville17-1176329937.dsl.bell.ca [70.29.94.209])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5SJosob047138
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 20:50:57 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:50:54 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <20150628195053.GA9909@muck>
References: <20150625223344.GA2406@muck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150625223344.GA2406@muck>
X-Server-Quench: fe9f339e-1dce-11e5-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVJwpGK10IU0Fd
P1hyKltILEZaQVBf Ri5dBBEKBAw1ADwr dVUTOktfalU0Glt1
UkhIR0JQFA9tARYE AVAZUgdwfhtPfGBy ZU99W3hcQ0U0MUMe
OBEXSj8GYWBha2hR VENZd00CJQocfRxM P01+ACBYfGQGM399
TgFsY3VpZW8CeXxc G1pQIQkEe0tZVg02 RgwJGjQpWEEIWRB7
BT0edANUWw46EmgZ En8GcnEkEjo/NCBk Pm98SCNUP10GVi8m Cx8y
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 70.29.94.209/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP65 / CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY deployment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:51:00 -0000
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code,
> using the same thresholds as BIP66.
I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the
IsSuperMajority() mechanism:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351
Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.
I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG)
soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable to
BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.
Once merged I'll prepare a backport of the soft-fork logic for the
v0.10.x branch as well.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000dbc12bdcb4d0a340272edd649d24849f86a20d075f0dba1
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=0/Ez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
|
