1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1TfcPy-0000wA-2h
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:15:06 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.223.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ie0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1TfcPv-0004oR-8t
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:15:04 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id qd14so4965568ieb.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:14:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.237.103 with SMTP id vb7mr300548igc.29.1354565698064; Mon,
03 Dec 2012 12:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.171.73 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:14:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50BD028F.3090206@petersson.at>
References: <80648682-E34A-455E-B34A-6BC24652C3EA@ceptacle.com>
<CAPg+sBi25xP8R03y1VR=q4ZJaeT6FAuV=hXsq_7niSHycpnPuA@mail.gmail.com>
<9CEDE4D4-3685-4F70-953E-15CC50A8AA3F@ceptacle.com>
<CAAS2fgTL=s-vvGsubUu9ZBMidd0wzZdVPb6rEUg+eTMaiipRbA@mail.gmail.com>
<50BCC28A.4060503@gmail.com>
<CANEZrP1SfJ1oybLB7rUGERS7_MxQA4UtB1d0SOQ2mUi8-XwU=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CADb9v0+WiNiZcnLN-BUOKK6wwSYaV-y0zrVvrPcXMJAd89o3PQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALf2ePx95F68q4-5UPatRxMcKL7yAR1dtZY3UVcGuH1_hrWBnw@mail.gmail.com>
<50BD028F.3090206@petersson.at>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:14:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSUUZY1MaHdezOpXs=zvWQGMWBnyO8uvC5Q5ntMDA9uGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Petersson <andreas@petersson.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1TfcPv-0004oR-8t
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Chain dust mitigation: Demurrage based
Chain Vacuuming
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:15:06 -0000
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Andreas Petersson <andreas@petersson.at> wr=
ote:
> These discussed features are all useful but quite contradicting.
>
> I imagine that a user will be able to switch between different coin
> selection policies "minimize fees","max privacy","defragmentation","i
> don't care" and even switch between them for individual sends.
While thats a fine thing=E2=80=94 and a feature that I'd personally use=E2=
=80=94 its
not one that I expect to have a real measurable impact on the overall
network behavior.
For this kind of minutia especially, defaults are all powerful and
must be the best they can be. :)
|
