1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB54C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C0041511
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 20C0041511
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8vro46Z8R5Vp
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 0069A414D1
Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0069A414D1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au (helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au)
by azure.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
id 1ohWLL-00044w-9N; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 23:27:50 +1000
Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Sun, 09 Oct 2022 23:27:42 +1000
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 23:27:42 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: eric@voskuil.org
Message-ID: <Y0LMTtOYdNjzJ1MN@erisian.com.au>
References: <03ca01d8d8fb$1558ed50$400ac7f0$@voskuil.org>
<040f01d8d93c$a58c2540$f0a46fc0$@voskuil.org>
<Yz/Hy39ablXUdmH+@erisian.com.au>
<069201d8db50$59a98c60$0cfca520$@voskuil.org>
<Y0JhqlNxUqVXQfpB@erisian.com.au>
<008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <008301d8dbac$c28280a0$478781e0$@voskuil.org>
X-Spam-Score-int: -18
X-Spam-Bar: -
Cc: 'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion' <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Packaged Transaction Relay
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 13:27:55 -0000
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 12:00:04AM -0700, eric@voskuil.org wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2022, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > > > > Protocol cannot be defined on an ad-hoc basis as a "courtesy"
> > > > BIPs are a courtesy in the first place.
> > > I suppose if you felt that you were the authority then this would be
> > > your perspective.
> > You seem to think that I'm arguing courtesy is not a good thing, or that
> we
> > couldn't use more of it?
> That is neither what I said nor implied. You were clearly dismissing the
> public process, not advocating for politeness.
And that is neither what I said nor implied, nor something I believe. If
you think courtesy is something that can be ignored in a public process,
I don't think you should expect much success.
If you'd like to actually participate in public standards development,
please feel free to make some technical comments on my proposals, or
others, or make your own proposal, either here or on github, or heck,
anywhere else.
I mean, that's what I'd suggest anyway; I'm not your boss. I promise to
at least be entertainingly surprised if you make any progress with your
current approach though.
Cheers,
aj
|
