blob: 8c9406b5da8b8049bb30132a301853c3f7576cd2 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1RrvST-0002KX-1Q
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:56:01 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com;
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1RrvSP-0005dX-5r
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:56:00 +0000
Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so4939293wgb.10
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:55:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.80.68 with SMTP id p4mr29545438wix.21.1327946151109; Mon,
30 Jan 2012 09:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.112.199 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:55:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2LBXsoQiQguJMoFhA9aM7bFE6AGX9czRQB2wti1Binqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RrvSP-0005dX-5r
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 16/17 deadlines
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:56:01 -0000
I've started a discussion on BIP 16/17 support moving forward
(including trying to improve the testing process) here:
=A0=A0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D61922.0
(please reply there so the discussion stays mostly in one place)
--
--
Gavin Andresen
|