summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/03/9aff8dfa7e40d48d2dab787f7480cee1eac3e8
blob: 4f121adf6955a0e4f9ff525533686cfaf02beb19 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1UJSXp-0002r5-Fp
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:47:53 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UJSXo-0003So-94
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:47:53 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q10so2011751pdj.26
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=9nqfl3lJhpG2xAWr60ETT6O2sSd97kjkRsEpCeCl+Dg=;
	b=R+rjoFPQxoClqVvA8smUncidRNMPZVQp8CY6uE91DqvxQJzM6CPe2dFMa1RRQZ4Uul
	5Syrag0iye3YcgnB4boPOwbeQ1wLusb5U6cE/rf9QazfbJTDbUML2FsFY/kxZvVzCeYs
	7H/25lIIaTg2kpuPZd9jKp/IV0SajCVfimEqgr+kC2apNe0fAJo7C09XbR9/7V+TyErF
	Ekzo6bc2g7M9e3QkhuVrv7y+kyAtJtScsuSRcY9UC1hvKUZMMSVMznWvxvvPX0/isS/c
	ILKRAU8GxwWKTzYAKKkl+MBcupk0G0OOqkfBy93RvdXadHEhkWw3vN6FJXPCmWtB5JTd
	3lTQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.102.165 with SMTP id fp5mr8833662pbb.82.1364060866206;
	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.146.133 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25]
In-Reply-To: <201303231743.59510.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CA+8xBpcwLUt=RBYynbQDwY2Bv1keCPy0pdXP4+8CG-wqvrxOCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201303231709.07059.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CA+8xBpc9n4_CDYTq80+u3V=sD+F-tTnc1NMVnK1Z_UnNix75dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201303231743.59510.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:47:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpfzNYqFm-zCD8L7KDiL9x+ez-pUM3B3T981D1n69t8gQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyZstRKy3V0+JH3kkHUysL1FjG8tnZz3fdTu741C8euiSaUE0PjsiX/99kc0ZFdhdQ1ioa
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [209.85.192.181 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Headers-End: 1UJSXo-0003So-94
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Upcoming network event: block v2 lock-in
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:47:53 -0000

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, March 23, 2013 5:28:55 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
>> > I don't think anyone is mining using bitcoind 0.7 or later?
>>
>> slush, BTC Guild, ozcoin too I think, several others.
>
> Not for producing coinbases (where BIP 34 is implemented).

Sure, that is largely the pool server layer.  But it is misleading to
imply that bitcoind is nowhere in the stack.

-- 
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com