summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/02/076d068b182161241f9ac7e7636c410c35bfb5
blob: a6e609c3112de8858f3609f50e27c3b16b2c8eab (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1Qoz3l-0003pH-4J
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:38:05 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1Qoz3k-0001Kv-9L for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:38:05 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 873822CCD
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu,  4 Aug 2011 16:19:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAJNQ0svWgFwZrra0gQFpxNLOPXk4RbKygeMUNPEA=k-Wqwa-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJNQ0svWgFwZrra0gQFpxNLOPXk4RbKygeMUNPEA=k-Wqwa-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-/cbPSTWQxysTlT6BLCwu"
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:14:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1312467294.9762.4.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1Qoz3k-0001Kv-9L
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Blitcoin? (Black Hat 2011)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:38:05 -0000


--=-/cbPSTWQxysTlT6BLCwu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds like Dan wrote a tool which attempts to connect inputs/outputs
and make a map of a person on the network, or at least thats my blind
guess.  Something people have been saying was easily possible for some
time, but for some reason people insist on refusing their precious
Bitcoin isnt anonymous.

Matt

On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:56 +0000, John Smith wrote:
> L.S.
>=20
> Some bitcoin "security vulnerabilities" have been discussed by Dan
> Kaminsky at BH 2011, there is one article about this dated yesterday:
>=20
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/2240039221/Black-Hat-2011-Dan-K=
aminsky-reveals-network-security-research-topics
>=20
> The article is very unspecific though. They talk about a tool called
> "blitcoin" that "unmasks" both sides of a bitcoin transaction. A
> google search also turned up nothing, except some misspellings.=20
>=20
> Does anyone have more information?
>=20
> JS

--=-/cbPSTWQxysTlT6BLCwu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=9ebt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-/cbPSTWQxysTlT6BLCwu--