summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/01/cf288d66e7af8e89c0f32019773b512d94abc9
blob: f7454f0b72ff0f107dddd703e047f835d2ca7e49 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1RsIya-0000Tq-14
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:02:44 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.210.47; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1RsIyU-0007n7-OV
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:02:43 +0000
Received: by dakj40 with SMTP id j40so250757dak.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:02:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.234.7 with SMTP id ua7mr41818866pbc.89.1328036552891; Tue,
	31 Jan 2012 11:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.143.8.11 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:02:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1328034145.2832.11.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
References: <1328020046.70720.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<1328025899.2832.5.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
	<1328034145.2832.11.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:02:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJAyNR7+=Dht4uLVjJ5DLLwhyG2aTDuFonu0ABXXCUVBKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d6d6fbde1e04b7d79a98
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RsIyU-0007n7-OV
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 20 Rejected, process for BIP 21N
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:02:44 -0000

--047d7b33d6d6fbde1e04b7d79a98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>wrote:

>
> All that said, I dont think its an ideal solution, depending on the
> names of variables to provide information is ugly.  If anyone has a
> better idea on how to do backward compatibility, please suggest it.
>

I like the mustimplement: idea, though I'd recommend a shorter
(abbreviated) prefix, to keep URL sizes small for QR codes and such,

Wladimir

--047d7b33d6d6fbde1e04b7d79a98
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Matt Corall=
o <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-list@bluematt.me">bitcoin=
-list@bluematt.me</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote=
" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
All that said, I dont think its an ideal solution, depending on the<br>
names of variables to provide information is ugly. =C2=A0If anyone has a<br=
>
better idea on how to do backward compatibility, please suggest it.<br></bl=
ockquote><div><br>I like the mustimplement: idea, though I&#39;d recommend =
a shorter (abbreviated) prefix, to keep URL sizes small for QR codes and su=
ch,<br>

<br>
Wladimir<br><br></div></div>

--047d7b33d6d6fbde1e04b7d79a98--