1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Return-Path: <kiwigb@yahoo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73030F2D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:58:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
(nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.74])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAF5FC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:58:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048;
t=1450472328; bh=RSjcsQ6f+QITWd1I+NJ68TsW0WsU1vXU05D1jzxQjqM=;
h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject;
b=ALeTFlYDeS9tzp6/+2Pmu5l6c/RNDBWm0RvF0haQxXVnpneB/ZI3KxucuCHKmgQyApXAF2MUFrxCFB5bTXGHDms9vsKrCmP7f1hvJZ3+ojnjAnemO/hHd5RWD1Smp7tOZvxeERBHG3w6joLgB0uWJSrMrpO08iCLTL7so7b2qlEuwxp+lF7jlzr1pH9r0J9uXYZqsvDeNvqjWX7781zp7ounMmi7AYqPwoflCV57UtuPnES5rUINSXjGHIAWKQTwN+p+gQRQectJ3OzjEiOHkYf5FOPqpNHgN58IqKH5es/v293C/Nc1Lw2ZiS4na7goEXdNsP1QDV28t/ObrVH2iA==
Received: from [66.196.81.172] by nm26.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
18 Dec 2015 20:58:48 -0000
Received: from [98.139.211.163] by tm18.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
18 Dec 2015 20:58:48 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp220.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
18 Dec 2015 20:58:48 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 113159.6546.bm@smtp220.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: aIb..xwVM1nfzpJOZfifVwCXxPKbnRC_BK2ZT3x6bMV.hdT
toUPZJkp_440oa0CHLtGgtKoJOrYY_LXngNbxw8ycsgroreGghNWN_OfeCUn
dHJ.G8q9A_USclz6jbX_VOad3R1tJHEPsaKIsnS7_OPMFtn8ScWRa0EFGhV7
cGvRkCJ6SPvhmD2P1TTj3XdX10GQX14Ax_pGTeCHcR7hUoPC7CHcIy6Hn.6U
48xAVhYvyHXvDnaKMntI1HLEH4cZ9LMrDqbpl_wZzQLBJpCpBz38UJfQDDA3
LrpnlE8oNq2CBFAn2xH6CQsFnv5XNyHMfZ3KwfCUNo1vJmfHZaM1fcrAxykw
CAGG4TSzw2wp.NrWxkStlqoU_qHKSNRZoXkZmz0.rRDtl58HCVOkcGALaA01
p2BckQ9TvBvqN9j4lIfCtak1YxHJZzmKvLcq47qZ_q3Bqj0hMeudlzdKaLY.
uKvDwaCj1tuMq4NpoI.FXTZXkiCBE4ZFzxo.0gbnNPst7_KuE.yliSkzhDRm
z1vkjhkSt0QAbL6ZUGqb4XcLE2EV9
X-Yahoo-SMTP: kMAkG6uswBCBwEfDAoIbXivsMA--
Message-ID: <1450472322.15256.7.camel@yahoo.com>
From: gb <kiwigb@yahoo.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:58:42 +1300
In-Reply-To: <CADm_Wcah3V7yxCpt97rK89_0GY8HZm6xbCg0yqjKRWak7crt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFzgq-xNZmWrdwCDv3twdsqSWk-FyMuLYJjZ_bA42_5Po0mgEg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqJgPM1KRRSR3wSEhQ77Oq6P_VVvHwc3Yt4qnkAr7d2nA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYFmvu+_OXjm53DHV_q2m8z7Q9zd7QaTrs-uqfiK62CAQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDoyzLErwA0g624A2aPUqSi3gXTgcmC7TTTUNDKyecDpuA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_Wcah3V7yxCpt97rK89_0GY8HZm6xbCg0yqjKRWak7crt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 08:36:55 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The increase of max block size should be
determined by block height instead of block time
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:58:49 -0000
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 15:15 -0500, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> My preference is height activation + one step per block (i.e. also
> height). Height seems KISS.
>
>
Under this scheme the size of the step-per-block increase could be
decreased every 210,000 blocks (at time of reward halvings).
So, a linear growth rate that decreases every ~4 years, ultimately
grandfathering max_block_size increases on the same block-schedule that
reward decreases.
|
