summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/00/f0319a982cb0a10b47716df8222dc97bb9be3c
blob: a90c12bd25478d1b4cf835e9b44e0ec08f904710 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1WTD3S-0007sv-UT
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:21:22 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WTD3R-00025g-3J
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:21:22 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id e49so3087139eek.11
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4Ec8H2USupvMJ18vvZ052u0T2cJdTWLPpgwMSYe1XAQ=;
	b=Sl1lwihMqFx8Zjgs4jX6eDIMW1dWnRw54pRFq8eIq2NqkG3GrMt38m2HFcKJItXblw
	kAJOKvDPRUs4VeAsXjwNE8Go/VV9VUTBO5LN3lpUyQciuGiP4+F6L0boFvniJ5LIF5nA
	MUIVyUBf+yO5/QLKpwJaJxntLP1F5W+pL9PU9x4ly1viYai61Yre0jeMsq3CYGZ4A34v
	D8ZL/mMFNYzO/PGhyDLdFrS4kgg34kBY4p49hqv2qTdiYR6Mmf1w29epBKDa9LKBlElN
	y3NK5K3yR1yUEUZTQ1o3aKFDq3vpOYWqCC/S3+dCt6Ebr8Clo9CogxsSlpllLqRlw+tX
	9KJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2V0sh7wQttgNZfJ/RHKOX14n5PyU06LqYPPI6dzXtzIrEuItJ8CMNFwSgV/0h/FDPd4Ry
X-Received: by 10.15.32.206 with SMTP id a54mr2406832eev.51.1395937274664;
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a42sm5334080ees.10.2014.03.27.09.21.12
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53344FF8.7030204@gk2.sk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:21:12 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>	<F2C8C044-EF92-4CCE-9235-28CA7FCE3526@bitsofproof.com>	<CAJHLa0PPAsBLgsy0vgPpUp=UzeR_fWUEzFb5+xtmODEk4MGPVQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJfRnm7V6fgcj=TMfa2ZTYWOKtE5aoUT1xnVtKUSyriB=6cagQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBjwf1TcK1CGKVKFzYbV-78j8t-pav7=PEgG7Yqi6-yE7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjwf1TcK1CGKVKFzYbV-78j8t-pav7=PEgG7Yqi6-yE7A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
X-Headers-End: 1WTD3R-00025g-3J
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:21:23 -0000

On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> That said, I'm not convinced about the extra layers. The "cointype" in
> my opinion isn't necessary inside the derivation. There is already
> support (4 bytes!) for magic bytes in the serialized form. Inside

Cointype in path is for separation purposes, not for identification.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>