1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Return-Path: <laanwj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551F6C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:14:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364B6400D5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:14:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IkSqSuwWLkdq
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:14:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.134])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B23400CE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:13:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:13:43 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail; t=1619460837;
bh=fFV1ASMHmGhl4j8CALRWavhD/gzpG9Vm1zb5JTn/ziQ=;
h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=xLtiXtzAbGCMWiv9sFZE7LWkBQThy7cJrMxXF/MhitjKgtbSKcIfhr0nPtqmfyMvX
0KLKjwi1oJ6+tF0L7JGkgsvHFNaTBaA4ypQro4nhzfsd2mmUoDoFdmWfXQIx3GN1tN
cLXPrTxQwitXAjczKv1ssL7r5pMtRoLULyHLicpY=
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: "W. J. van der Laan" <laanwj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: "W. J. van der Laan" <laanwj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <1WIiTmVcZnaQqfyOqJmepetY5lZmcFtZmH9rpY647HWyixcTXbLps0Qy7W8pdCGSRBzgtpF_DHFj4NfuVGrdJ0rQkYpqvyyVCopekAmt76w=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:54:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:14:01 -0000
On Friday, April 23rd, 2021 at 4:09 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoi=
n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to
> assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
ACK on adding Kalle.
I'm happy to finally see someone else interested in BIP maintainer role, fo=
r years no one really seemed to care about doing this mostly procedural/bur=
eaucratic function, which is (part of) the reason Luke-Jr ended up as the o=
nly BIP maintainer for such a long time.
And I disagree that a bot could do this just as well. Auto-merging would op=
en it up to all kinds of DoS attacks, vandalism, and low-effort scams that =
a person can easily ward against.
-W
|
