Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author | Files | Lines |
2022-10-19 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF against package li... | Greg Sanders | 1 | -0/+683 |
2022-06-14 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why OpenTimestamps does not "linearize" its transactions | Undiscussed Horrific Abuse, One Victim of Many | 1 | -0/+175 |
2022-05-19 | [bitcoin-dev] CTV BIP Meeting #9 Notes | alicexbt | 1 | -0/+331 |
2022-04-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically reverting ("transitory") soft forks, e.g. for... | James O'Beirne | 1 | -0/+164 |
2022-02-27 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Recursive covenant opposition, or the absence thereof, was ... | Billy Tetrud | 1 | -0/+364 |
2022-02-25 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft-BIP: Ordinal Numbers | Billy Tetrud | 1 | -0/+151 |
2022-02-20 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt | Erik Aronesty | 1 | -0/+245 |
2022-02-18 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Thoughts on fee bumping | Prayank | 1 | -0/+116 |
2022-01-27 | [bitcoin-dev] Improving RBF Policy | Gloria Zhao | 1 | -0/+904 |
2022-01-04 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt | Prayank | 1 | -0/+255 |
2021-09-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY covenant opcode | Jeremy | 1 | -0/+384 |
2021-07-13 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] An idea to block invalid addresses from reaching the peers.... | Pieter Wuille | 1 | -0/+188 |
2021-06-30 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trinary Version Signaling for softfork upgrades | Jorge Timón | 1 | -0/+1204 |
2021-05-23 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Consensus protocol immutability is a feature | vjudeu | 1 | -0/+278 |
2021-05-18 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fee estimates and RBF | ZmnSCPxj | 1 | -0/+99 |
2021-04-21 | [bitcoin-dev] Decentralized Naming Protocol BIP | Christopher Gilliard | 1 | -0/+106 |
2021-03-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot activation proposal "Speedy Trial" | Russell O'Connor | 1 | -0/+746 |
2021-03-04 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP70 is dead. What now? | P G | 1 | -0/+481 |
2020-09-19 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Replacement for RBF and CPFP: Non-Destructive TXID Depend... | Jeremy | 1 | -0/+154 |
2019-10-04 | [bitcoin-dev] Smaller "Bitcoin address" accounts in the blockchain. | Dave Scotese | 1 | -0/+110 |
2019-09-09 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] PoW fraud proofs without a soft fork | ZmnSCPxj | 1 | -0/+99 |
2019-05-24 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] OP_DIFFICULTY to enable difficulty hedges (bets) without an... | Johnson Lau | 1 | -0/+101 |
2018-12-28 | [bitcoin-dev] Create a BIP to implement Confidential Transactions in Bitcoin ... | SomberNight | 1 | -0/+91 |
2017-11-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Protocol-Level Pruning | Bryan Bishop | 1 | -0/+125 |
2017-07-21 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] UTXO growth scaling solution proposal | Moral Agent | 1 | -0/+193 |
2017-05-22 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal to reintroduce the disabled script opcodes | Ethan Heilman | 1 | -0/+124 |
2017-04-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the Bitcoin POW... | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+131 |
2017-03-31 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting | Jared Lee Richardson | 1 | -0/+393 |
2017-03-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Inquiry: Transaction Tiering | Andrew Baine | 1 | -0/+353 |
2017-03-26 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Defending against empty or near empty blocks from malicious... | Alex Morcos | 1 | -0/+465 |
2017-02-25 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] SHA1 collisions make Git vulnerable to attakcs by third-par... | Peter Todd | 1 | -0/+112 |
2017-01-04 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Committed bloom filters for improved wallet performance and... | Jonas Schnelli | 1 | -0/+154 |
2016-12-14 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Forcenet: an experimental network with a new header format | Johnson Lau | 1 | -0/+266 |
2016-10-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Start time for BIP141 (segwit) | Tom Zander | 1 | -0/+94 |
2016-07-27 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: derived mnemonics | Jochen Hoenicke | 1 | -0/+120 |
2016-05-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bip44 extension for P2SH/P2WSH/... | Daniel Weigl | 1 | -0/+117 |
2015-12-19 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] On the security of softforks | Bryan Bishop | 1 | -0/+96 |
2015-10-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin-NG whitepaper. | Ittay | 1 | -0/+236 |
2015-10-06 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork technical debate | Milly Bitcoin | 1 | -0/+72 |
2015-10-05 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! | Jorge Timón | 1 | -0/+116 |
2015-09-29 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] On bitcoin-dev list admin and list noise | Santino Napolitano | 1 | -0/+65 |
2015-09-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! | Mike Hearn | 1 | -0/+176 |
2015-09-27 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Weak block thoughts... | Tier Nolan | 1 | -0/+125 |
2015-09-16 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and delay. | Jorge Timón | 1 | -0/+277 |
2015-08-12 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process | Venzen Khaosan | 1 | -0/+115 |
2015-07-17 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias | Justin Newton | 1 | -0/+1138 |
2015-07-15 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed transactions | Me | 1 | -0/+184 |
2015-06-28 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit | Benjamin | 1 | -0/+288 |
2015-06-26 | Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks | Jeff Garzik | 1 | -0/+371 |
2015-06-19 | Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mailman incompatibility with DKIM ... | Mike Hearn | 1 | -0/+119 |