diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | 30/0d5704d98a93da5527af9038acc59f3974ba75 | 132 |
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/30/0d5704d98a93da5527af9038acc59f3974ba75 b/30/0d5704d98a93da5527af9038acc59f3974ba75 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e9527cd2f --- /dev/null +++ b/30/0d5704d98a93da5527af9038acc59f3974ba75 @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) + by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00352C002B + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:39 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE4606F9 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:39 +0000 (UTC) +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 86EE4606F9 +Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, + unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com + header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=n3FT+kkM +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org +X-Spam-Flag: NO +X-Spam-Score: -2.602 +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 + tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] + autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no +Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) + with ESMTP id 8Lug_5lUdOnn + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:38 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 +DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 42CE5606EC +Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com + [64.147.123.20]) + by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CE5606EC + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Feb 2023 12:06:38 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) + by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7F32007F1; + Sun, 5 Feb 2023 07:06:36 -0500 (EST) +Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) + by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Feb 2023 07:06:36 -0500 +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= + messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type + :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to + :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender + :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender + :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1675598795; x=1675685195; bh=J + ja8ATwV2F/Ikk9h4GqiCoOqEnyFrCqCKCnJ02Lh8Fw=; b=n3FT+kkMb2DQKvN6F + PD3HuqT+WMB13zbX6xCo+/rAaC2S+mgNOp+V6LREXN1r7CsGJNrompqGIO7pK/rB + Tj3OqtJgn2em1l9qU+w35yMLnOzWybRGbGA5JLWieXB7dmaycxN340UiYvfMnsEO + kk3X/+ftMsnx3ZFf4AWMsEm7ENGPU47MqqawTSFD77lzz/nwxYYPVrmGJam51IZa + bpqc5AOd45Eh4LvAVUIHIgDJxByhD50sQ8RDso+thCU9SQLqUtqMb3mh+U2jCP1g + 9b/XQhGs+W67CbKn1zuO6v9CrgWLHryHIy0EbBqhms3hl9+GPMVZ4+3j4C8PXhmF + OG7gg== +X-ME-Sender: <xms:y5vfY_ZtaEicwbjCNg9LHYlPeVsMbBFYuinHknceKtXSUhtwJVtVdQ> + <xme:y5vfY-bx_6G5KbmYVeBEd9DCYrxU0XtRx5lvYev007qMxMDw4JlivjNJzI8QvSZFu + B053U8miLgDZRmzo_8> +X-ME-Received: <xmr:y5vfYx_7tliwlc8Y7-iqQ6wtbj_Q8ATAFljyJXW5x6KgTwUQji6z2-pi0Uef> +X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeggedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf + fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen + uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne + cujfgurhepfffhvffufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv + rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth + gvrhhnpefhteeuleffvddujeejteejjefgjeefleeiieejudeiiedvueegffefueeglefg + ueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvg + htvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh +X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y5vfY1oy_tLoLqNkpppmYVyt9rS3m3q8SuV5ikzKA99esMAPnP33XA> + <xmx:y5vfY6oQtOpzhWajak6T9pmrdwKRrdjnZTGHbX4c5yVDSwRN7wT5Ow> + <xmx:y5vfY7RwQv8FXJ4Ofq023abRaAjPtPNIgkd_JiaAtzyUMdx-SujLfA> + <xmx:y5vfYzmw2TV4a_ORi2Mkq9oSeJhJNpk-pkJAG7nFti3_Uvu1trhCRQ> +Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail +Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, + 5 Feb 2023 07:06:34 -0500 (EST) +Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:06:33 +0100 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, + Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> +User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android +In-Reply-To: <0267d5bb-a54b-894b-3d45-e6cb89eb86a5@peersm.com> +References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com> + <ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com> + <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com> + <CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com> + <CABE6yHtM2Dqc63_eURSr7dMirJti5sYnqvHj7vQ_Ab9FC_d04g@mail.gmail.com> + <3d00aacb-585d-f875-784d-34352860d725@peersm.com> + <CACrqygB_FbsRGWYPSUEFTnP15y94Hmo4JtAuv6bH1D3YtbAw9Q@mail.gmail.com> + <b292d887-cbd5-165c-de01-793df2b5e8f3@peersm.com> + <CACrqygAv842ucN7PLYMENXFiSwAZJy2Y+FziJXrWjyCcOXmL3g@mail.gmail.com> + <230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com> + <28C74556-8AB4-4E16-AC7D-7F3FAA0A29AC@petertodd.org> + <0267d5bb-a54b-894b-3d45-e6cb89eb86a5@peersm.com> +Message-ID: <B7A37621-AC21-43FE-A60D-7516FFD69FCF@petertodd.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE + OP_IF OP_PUSH +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:06:40 -0000 + + + +On February 5, 2023 12:40:38 PM GMT+01:00, Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm= +=2Ecom> wrote: +>I think logically: +> +>- if you want to store something big and can afford several txs in your +>design, then you use something like witness +> +>- if you want to store small things like signatures, addresses hashes +>and some metadata and your design does not make several txs easy, then +>you use OP_RETURN +> +>Then how can we move forward with several OP_RETURN and no size limit? + +Because what matters is the impact on other users=2E OpReturn isn't in UTX= +O space and doesn't even take advantage of the witness discount, so it clea= +rly has minimal impact=2E + +Since it has minimal impact, there's no reason to micromanage exactly how = +people use it=2E Let them decide for themselves with the fee market=2E This= + is exactly the same as how we didn't put artificial limits on Taproot=2E + |