summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ec
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Collins <davec@conformal.com>2015-05-19 11:05:18 -0500
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-05-19 16:23:50 +0000
commit2361ad654a346bffc70add0d1dca8caf415f56a7 (patch)
tree57bb0242e3d782c98c0f35a427f2ca6151378f51 /ec
parentc7f91fc4d451911e1fcb4b0eadcbb951350908c3 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-2361ad654a346bffc70add0d1dca8caf415f56a7.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-2361ad654a346bffc70add0d1dca8caf415f56a7.zip
[Bitcoin-development] Regtest Consensus Forking Behavior Introduced in Bitcoin Core in May 2014
Diffstat (limited to 'ec')
-rw-r--r--ec/b9af79d7628549b1c4d458b22db2bfc07a8993104
1 files changed, 104 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ec/b9af79d7628549b1c4d458b22db2bfc07a8993 b/ec/b9af79d7628549b1c4d458b22db2bfc07a8993
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c1c8426bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ec/b9af79d7628549b1c4d458b22db2bfc07a8993
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <davec@conformal.com>) id 1YukJ4-0004Kd-Qf
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 16:23:50 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of conformal.com
+ designates 204.124.83.141 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=204.124.83.141; envelope-from=davec@conformal.com;
+ helo=comm0.conformal.com;
+Received: from comm0.conformal.com ([204.124.83.141])
+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1YukJ3-00018b-H3
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 16:23:50 +0000
+Received: from [192.168.32.100] (cpe-24-243-251-52.hot.res.rr.com
+ [24.243.251.52])
+ (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by comm0.conformal.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DE12B6CAEA
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 19 May 2015 11:05:13 -0500 (CDT)
+Message-ID: <555B5F3E.1070605@conformal.com>
+Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:05:18 -0500
+From: Dave Collins <davec@conformal.com>
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
+ rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature";
+ boundary="s2huvUi3fu7EW5ka28vLSUqTqlv3qREJf"
+X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+X-Headers-End: 1YukJ3-00018b-H3
+Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Consensus Forking Behavior Introduced
+ in Bitcoin Core in May 2014
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:23:50 -0000
+
+This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
+--s2huvUi3fu7EW5ka28vLSUqTqlv3qREJf
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+Hello All,
+
+Josh Rickmar and I discovered a subtle consensus change in Bitcoin Core
+which causes forking behavior on regtest. Luckily it does not affect
+mainnet or testnet, however it does mean that regtest difficulty
+retargetting is broken.
+
+I've made a post to the bitcointalk forums at
+https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D1065504 for the nicer formattin=
+g
+which explains in detail.
+
+Regards,
+
+Dave Collins
+
+
+--s2huvUi3fu7EW5ka28vLSUqTqlv3qREJf
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
+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+=kRy7
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--s2huvUi3fu7EW5ka28vLSUqTqlv3qREJf--
+
+