summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/aa
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>2011-09-06 13:59:29 -0400
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-09-06 17:59:36 +0000
commit41622dd370681e03e5c3dc3854b36fd411b3ac13 (patch)
treea0790b28c09ef16cb5fe1cfa8a5d5859fd169e2f /aa
parent692cc418e3f4eac9a893da036e9f40dd569f2d41 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-41622dd370681e03e5c3dc3854b36fd411b3ac13.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-41622dd370681e03e5c3dc3854b36fd411b3ac13.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs
Diffstat (limited to 'aa')
-rw-r--r--aa/c963f65938a66a3fd7e52ff1cbc94cd29a7617103
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/aa/c963f65938a66a3fd7e52ff1cbc94cd29a7617 b/aa/c963f65938a66a3fd7e52ff1cbc94cd29a7617
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9be4dc2ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/aa/c963f65938a66a3fd7e52ff1cbc94cd29a7617
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1R0zvs-0004cx-PU
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:59:36 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.161.47; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-fx0-f47.google.com;
+Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1R0zvr-0000SA-Pw
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:59:36 +0000
+Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so29127fxg.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.223.47.156 with SMTP id n28mr126798faf.7.1315331969478; Tue,
+ 06 Sep 2011 10:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.152.22.130 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjy1FANzv5N7P4kx0Djqz-P2XbqQAFTxnK-MVu8erja+g@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CABsx9T1juB-0hr9NW=PoO5eh_Aqhzkiv3tnXTSTsjBKiy4y0JA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <20110904115926.GA16476@ulyssis.org>
+ <CAPg+sBjy1FANzv5N7P4kx0Djqz-P2XbqQAFTxnK-MVu8erja+g@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:59:29 -0400
+Message-ID: <CABsx9T3kV884bc-f9SVBGPixMOi6fEwo4do8gixTBTK-szFS1A@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
+To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1R0zvr-0000SA-Pw
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:59:36 -0000
+
+Nice work, Detective Wuille!
+
+Patch for the deadlock issue:
+
+https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/500
+
+I took a different approach to fix from the one Pieter suggested,
+performing the database operation after the cs_mapaddresses deadlock
+is released. Please review to check my logic, it did survive my
+start/stop/restart... stress test.
+
+And I did review every place in the code that starts a database
+transaction, to look for similar issues, and they are all OK.
+
+
+RE: improving DEBUG_LOCKORDER: requires some thought. Deadlocks are
+still possible with TRY_CRITICAL_SECTION, if some codepaths TRY and
+some don't.
+
+
+On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Pieter Wuille
+<pieter.wuille@cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:
+> My mistake: these are not actual potential deadlocks, as all locking
+> of cs_vRecv/cs_vSend
+> happens inside TRY_CRITICAL_SECTION blocks. Gavin, maybe you can add the rule to
+> your debug code that ignores critical sections which are only locked
+> through TRY_...?
+>
+>>> + sipa found what looks like a deadlock between the addr-handling and
+>>> IRC-join-handling code.
+>
+> Regarding the actual deadlock between IRC seeding and AddAddress:
+>
+> Internally, DB also uses pthreads to implement the txn_begin()/commit() scheme,
+> though I'm not sure with which granularity. These need to be taken into account
+> when searching for deadlocks, but are obviously not detected by
+> DEBUG_LOCKORDER.
+
+
+--
+--
+Gavin Andresen
+
+