diff options
| author | Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> | 2014-04-15 17:11:40 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-04-15 15:11:46 +0000 |
| commit | fd1655b2b1f4907a16ce9624f0523f482ab3504f (patch) | |
| tree | 60012e6b3bc996235cdc553705c22ed42184a2e3 | |
| parent | 35f53638b561c4bc51c4d14935fff24c3e7a95a6 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-fd1655b2b1f4907a16ce9624f0523f482ab3504f.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-fd1655b2b1f4907a16ce9624f0523f482ab3504f.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind?
| -rw-r--r-- | fb/3f655c90f37cfeed0c3ef16fe311127d9bf7bd | 85 |
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fb/3f655c90f37cfeed0c3ef16fe311127d9bf7bd b/fb/3f655c90f37cfeed0c3ef16fe311127d9bf7bd new file mode 100644 index 000000000..07b905645 --- /dev/null +++ b/fb/3f655c90f37cfeed0c3ef16fe311127d9bf7bd @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>) id 1Wa51W-0005b9-Rf + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:11:46 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.213.179; envelope-from=pieter.wuille@gmail.com; + helo=mail-ig0-f179.google.com; +Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Wa51W-0003wH-10 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:11:46 +0000 +Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hl10so4554763igb.0 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:11:40 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.42.120.15 with SMTP id d15mr2202878icr.35.1397574700673; + Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:11:40 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.50.141.135 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:11:40 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1mgKRL9GTFtsokXv92LfDhOHR6uZ=KKn4RSopQpUc_Tw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <1756895.gV83Q4MX2a@crushinator> + <CANEZrP1mgKRL9GTFtsokXv92LfDhOHR6uZ=KKn4RSopQpUc_Tw@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:11:40 +0200 +Message-ID: <CAPg+sBgHZcdjRM+-UbSzuATBjj=yfBcqDMih+tAOYKBs=dLfWQ@mail.gmail.com> +From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (pieter.wuille[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Wa51W-0003wH-10 +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in + Bitcoind? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:11:47 -0000 + +The first input seems to be already spent by another transaction +(which looks very similar). + +0.9 should report a more detailed reason for rejection, by the way. + + + +On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote: +> Check debug.log to find out the reason it was rejected. +> +> +> +> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ +> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book +> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their +> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, +> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! +> http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech +> _______________________________________________ +> Bitcoin-development mailing list +> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development +> + + |