diff options
| author | Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> | 2018-09-05 15:35:14 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2018-09-05 15:35:30 +0000 |
| commit | fcde4721e4c2763235f0e85725c79a838ed845f6 (patch) | |
| tree | 4602d6d5c95ea6f2b59c12c4860056f565d2d4fd | |
| parent | 6617b000a95a631d9f54ac06014e18dfdb705812 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-fcde4721e4c2763235f0e85725c79a838ed845f6.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-fcde4721e4c2763235f0e85725c79a838ed845f6.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Schnorr signatures BIP
| -rw-r--r-- | 41/7e9c96f3cb930d73c14980203d63333d271077 | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/41/7e9c96f3cb930d73c14980203d63333d271077 b/41/7e9c96f3cb930d73c14980203d63333d271077 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0e6af4efe --- /dev/null +++ b/41/7e9c96f3cb930d73c14980203d63333d271077 @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5EA14DD + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:35:30 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com (mail-vk0-f53.google.com + [209.85.213.53]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B1A7A6 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:35:29 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-vk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 125-v6so2840332vke.11 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:35:29 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to; + bh=ZMEG5evi7BDbV6JMLzMIeCq3XZO4edbhsk4YfPwGrCE=; + b=CIL8S6nmZQYu6gfKRGmiLvNooed9OmJHqyPj/NDHM2JqnypkECUmMcfLm4PZQDxeqx + W1tzpv+4JpjcjrE6Y7eKPrYCYWuAlnu//z8CSOk4habz9tJs9mEbhBOmkMwGvhZA6MBH + d/bdeA/ASF1j5Da+4O3GEqTDGDO9mlZ3mQWMg5O0ORWg8vz4xkcNpUXiuFZIedgsRWZf + mvS0L8dJKl5y8D0+4rWbHbjLSl2Bl8BNeHZy8YvX1CV8IxaIwKuzb6tUr3SarjwPuOwH + UELOlg41fy7MYLX3Zqvlu1LLy6pUvKMnULVN7f5mhM95+V4t039FGP8ttkHGyFwjdhCA + qGTA== +X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Cw0KlWUrzsVUOwBgKhkUjtm41OtDQDvRWOhH68Yu1DFqJCCJql + CpHLZTK8N9IhoMyU7lLtaX21nUPsle52Gn0owWmoQ21O +X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYvJ4e7X+cBzrIRVrncH0SDUQ8/OncfUf7KkGvZcAAMHS2j0tEfqq9Q/qL5Wu/uW99gsAhZ50EJb3ab56yRsho= +X-Received: by 2002:a1f:8ad3:: with SMTP id + m202-v6mr18850415vkd.9.1536161728788; + Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:35:28 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <CAPg+sBj7f+=OYXuOMdNeJk3NBG67FSQSF8Xv3seFCvwxCWq69A@mail.gmail.com> + <2e620d305c86f65cbff44b5fba548dc85c118f84.camel@timruffing.de> + <20180812163734.GV499@boulet.lan> + <CAJowKg+h11YkwOo-gyWCw+87Oh-9K34LOnJ1730hhpoVR2m5sA@mail.gmail.com> + <20180903000518.GB18522@boulet.lan> + <CAJowKg+PDtEV3je_N9Ra6u3n4+ZQ3ozYapt8ivxGYYU28Qad+w@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAJowKg+PDtEV3je_N9Ra6u3n4+ZQ3ozYapt8ivxGYYU28Qad+w@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> +Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:35:14 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAAS2fgT0uBGbLBOW4TxA-qCzOLwoQ1qSV-R0dMKRzPLAm_UOqQ@mail.gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:07:15 +0000 +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Schnorr signatures BIP +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 15:35:30 -0000 + +On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:49 PM Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev +<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> Detailed explanation with code snippets: +> +> https://medium.com/@simulx/an-m-of-n-bitcoin-multisig-scheme-[snip] + +This appears to be a repost of the broken scheme you posted about on +Bitcointalk, but then failed to respond to the response. + +https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4973123.0 + +> The more I look into it and speak to professors about i, the more it seems "so trivial nobody really talks about it". + +I think you might be falling into the trap of ignoring feedback you +don't like and and accepting that which sounds like "yea yea, +something like that". + +Something "like that" does work: and is expressly and explicitly +anticipated by the BIP but to be both secure and functional requires +proper delineation (E.g. musig) _and_ interaction. What you're +proposing is continually vague. My best efforts at making sense of +what you've written indicate that either it's non-interactive and +not-actually functional at all, OR it's interactive and just a less +secure subset (no proper delinearization to prevent rogue key attacks) +of what we already propose. + +When Poelstra suggests a CAS implementation he means something like +this Sage notebook: http://bitcoin.ninja/secp256k1.ecdsa.sage This +provides for a method of communicating in both directions which is +completely precise. + |