diff options
author | Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com> | 2015-06-27 12:55:27 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-06-27 19:55:29 +0000 |
commit | fbab89829fb2fb3786f08b2899bbebd13c305fe9 (patch) | |
tree | 5f2cff230df15da9b4a1707d2b775e957dc1ce23 | |
parent | 120af0292b4296709ec7a22415d8819fc000b859 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-fbab89829fb2fb3786f08b2899bbebd13c305fe9.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-fbab89829fb2fb3786f08b2899bbebd13c305fe9.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
-rw-r--r-- | 95/af2cdf3ac9e038c9a92a3f66cdf86948798371 | 96 |
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/95/af2cdf3ac9e038c9a92a3f66cdf86948798371 b/95/af2cdf3ac9e038c9a92a3f66cdf86948798371 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c0099858f --- /dev/null +++ b/95/af2cdf3ac9e038c9a92a3f66cdf86948798371 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Return-Path: <voisine@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43427BB3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:29 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com + [209.85.216.173]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3D815F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:28 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by qczu9 with SMTP id u9so9844786qcz.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=pSuUBWZZzO+73WS+OYLnfSLef27/DplGjlrf/UQ5zzk=; + b=zCC/bB+Xv43WqujqcOv+VVd2QJzIOj26ss/2buVWfrybvZ6M/OlL4rYtEHF/c1TNCg + YzTvnAaJ12PSM8zUBlX43vWuknX6FDJq81QKzgTFHT5y2AA9e1HM5BBEWyT8KaRvnFQZ + WghPs3FKp6hvwSdNjNHaQVhn9fxZ5mvhZFXKimTXVbIUMznsTDQsjYuCQhGn2/dqoj2A + aLMsnsLZVagg/6D6upls3cJiMNB5Oj+gNzwYYW+RJuk6WoBmzBDd2ZbYy37Qv22p4GRT + Z3fDcTSb9DNrqWVsyXAh9cmPgjKgszanvZLd967VPB47QMfBH5TYe9268cOFplUmYrw6 + rGyg== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.55.25.40 with SMTP id k40mr17360270qkh.30.1435434927970; + Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.140.91.37 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <558E78CB.7070207@mail.bihthai.net> +References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com> + <20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com> + <20150627095501.C59B541A40@smtp.hushmail.com> + <558E78CB.7070207@mail.bihthai.net> +Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700 +Message-ID: <CACq0ZD5WV-J1H7QA0F2wnErXVFJ3MSxWtQidPhVwaxauoHQz_A@mail.gmail.com> +From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com> +To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:29 -0000 + +--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail.bihthai.net> +wrote: + +> +> That is a false assumption. Given the increased adoption of Bitcoin by +> users and businesses during the past year, does the price chart +> reflect greater value or price? Of course not, the price chart is at +> terminal lows. Fact not fiction. +> + +You're not taking speculative cycles into account. For most of 2013 the +price was in the $100 range. Adoption as a store-of-value is what +determines the price over the long term, as with any monetary commodity. + +--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Venzen Khaosan <span dir= +=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:venzen@mail.bihthai.net" target=3D"_blank">v= +enzen@mail.bihthai.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra">= +<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi= +n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br> +That is a false assumption. Given the increased adoption of Bitcoin by<br> +users and businesses during the past year, does the price chart<br> +reflect greater value or price? Of course not, the price chart is at<br> +terminal lows. Fact not fiction.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You= +9;re not taking speculative cycles into account. For most of 2013 the price= + was in the $100 range. Adoption as a store-of-value is what determines the= + price over the long term, as with any monetary commodity.</div></div></div= +></div> + +--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8-- + |