diff options
author | sickpig <sickpig@gmail.com> | 2014-02-10 12:54:36 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-02-10 11:55:04 +0000 |
commit | fa3818c8c2257a8cdf6422144aa75e6ec6d777ee (patch) | |
tree | 2ee9f43181bbd1f7be6e8b6114ca4d5e885215fc | |
parent | 4cae231e1aabad01ee22d55add45aae781e06f98 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-fa3818c8c2257a8cdf6422144aa75e6ec6d777ee.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-fa3818c8c2257a8cdf6422144aa75e6ec6d777ee.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] MtGox blames bitcoin
-rw-r--r-- | 78/a9ab2b456c8aa35136b8bf4fa90406f911c8cf | 73 |
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/78/a9ab2b456c8aa35136b8bf4fa90406f911c8cf b/78/a9ab2b456c8aa35136b8bf4fa90406f911c8cf new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0612a3647 --- /dev/null +++ b/78/a9ab2b456c8aa35136b8bf4fa90406f911c8cf @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <sickpig@gmail.com>) id 1WCpS4-0006JD-52 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:55:04 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=sickpig@gmail.com; + helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com; +Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1WCpS2-0001ke-W3 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:55:04 +0000 +Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z11so3615412lbi.26 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:54:56 -0800 (PST) +X-Received: by 10.112.74.39 with SMTP id q7mr370770lbv.64.1392033296323; Mon, + 10 Feb 2014 03:54:56 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.152.121.101 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:54:36 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <CANAnSg1LgpHGf-vTV0to1Z7sogf1ic6WTbogEsrQy1wh4C5zfw@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CANAnSg1LgpHGf-vTV0to1Z7sogf1ic6WTbogEsrQy1wh4C5zfw@mail.gmail.com> +From: "sickpig@gmail.com" <sickpig@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:54:36 +0100 +Message-ID: <CA+c4Zowae-YHE6yqfM_z1MUzTANBgOv=jH3ZR+EtT5Q+TWDz6Q@mail.gmail.com> +To: Drak <drak@zikula.org> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (sickpig[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1WCpS2-0001ke-W3 +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] MtGox blames bitcoin +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:55:04 -0000 + +Hi, + +On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Drak <drak@zikula.org> wrote: +> What is the official response from the Bitcoin Core developers about MtGox's +> assertion that their problems are due to a fault of bitcoin, as opposed to a +> fault of their own? +> +> The technical analysis preluding this mess, was that MtGox was at fault for +> their faulty wallet implementation. + +this seems a fair explanation of what happened: + +http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1x93tf/some_irc_chatter_about_what_is_going_on_at_mtgox/cf99yac + + |