summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEmil Engler <me@emilengler.com>2019-06-09 20:56:47 +0200
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2019-06-09 18:56:50 +0000
commitf8711d89dd57cfb80bacbab22241f232c2abcd6c (patch)
treef5559c11e5444be678dafa452f4e3b20259ace5c
parenta6752baf4f0d9a6051875809be4ee1fa6d2132ae (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-f8711d89dd57cfb80bacbab22241f232c2abcd6c.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-f8711d89dd57cfb80bacbab22241f232c2abcd6c.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
-rw-r--r--de/02fb81b68128c1de5b1ded0ba162900d43b04983
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/de/02fb81b68128c1de5b1ded0ba162900d43b049 b/de/02fb81b68128c1de5b1ded0ba162900d43b049
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4d31f13f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/de/02fb81b68128c1de5b1ded0ba162900d43b049
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+Return-Path: <realemilengler@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E33CDD
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com
+ [209.85.208.51])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562CB174
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a14so9050340edv.12
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
+ :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
+ :content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=KigdlOC9fmeJSLYHrZXT/aarzhA4APJkCzcKvHWE90g=;
+ b=ms3EgmDUbc3dT496vhzwkGT/jTC51RnMVbUse9v0ifEoMkKZA9SznvkQByt5Ad7dDC
+ w++8aGu/7HagJsMXTpdx87j1Z3E4HGJMjmV/0q9DOu1KpiD+PHuo8dC0KwPLHem1oHMs
+ Jq4ctnPcbe683vJ8aBXNLRkq3g9FlB7pUfpJ4WtKsrsPqmsdg/HcAr2hR9A6UCzz2igG
+ kBh7EE9D7pr0beOOcKDiqIG9cfzAzyf8slIq1XUx9vlafJc7nHJeSSEoBY5dnwAHg9SS
+ ui+39Yla90NAZKVD9Z92Vcy3kQHXSEJcSFeDWg+XZSNqlLK4GmuxotRruWIGPOQjXWRQ
+ 8X0w==
+X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWahNO5w/6Ja1lYiSl6XL5Gn/AFGzdlxWxXLe/f969IqNadzobx
+ WeN0Lm75vkVy35RjltczOmvD4X7D
+X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyLp3VJguyZr0MUonOeF2Co9Eq1aV2z6sftpnn59tkN/4Vc3wyuFapoANIIP/Uwn/mmFHBOA==
+X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58cf:: with SMTP id
+ e15mr6414338ejs.240.1560106608741;
+ Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b?
+ ([2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b])
+ by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
+ h22sm2272676edr.56.2019.06.09.11.56.48
+ (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
+ Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
+To: Tim Menapace <tim_jannik@gmx.de>, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+References: <mailman.1827.1560068363.7313.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+ <F1FD5AC3-12F0-4087-8AB6-D7DCF7799FF4@gmx.de>
+From: Emil Engler <me@emilengler.com>
+Message-ID: <d56dfe90-4977-def6-e35b-81bbbdb5c1da@emilengler.com>
+Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:56:47 +0200
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
+ Thunderbird/60.7.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <F1FD5AC3-12F0-4087-8AB6-D7DCF7799FF4@gmx.de>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
+Content-Language: en-US
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 21:17:52 +0000
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:56:51 -0000
+
+But using the testnet means that you actually need to deal with resets.
+There were 2 resets in the past but the last was in 2011.
+
+Am 09.06.19 um 16:55 schrieb Tim Menapace:
+> >I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is
+> >a (probably better) alternative for it. The >testnet is still a thing and
+> >is also used.
+>
+> Like Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions,
+> hardware prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will be on
+> current levels in a short period of time.
+