summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>2014-03-12 11:35:45 -0400
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2014-03-12 15:36:12 +0000
commitf52ba47e7de16f2c3517f3b76b70b48eabed5fe1 (patch)
tree78fe1cd62170313deb2e06028bf7ee159bf3edcd
parent34afcb02b4c19687b494b935c3323890427e5dfb (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-f52ba47e7de16f2c3517f3b76b70b48eabed5fe1.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-f52ba47e7de16f2c3517f3b76b70b48eabed5fe1.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol?
-rw-r--r--24/fb00512202f30bafcc0a1a9de397003ad2739c102
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/24/fb00512202f30bafcc0a1a9de397003ad2739c b/24/fb00512202f30bafcc0a1a9de397003ad2739c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ee0f627fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/24/fb00512202f30bafcc0a1a9de397003ad2739c
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1WNlCW-0008N8-L0
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:36:12 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
+ designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.212.170; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
+ helo=mail-wi0-f170.google.com;
+Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170])
+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1WNlCV-0005Pi-KM
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:36:12 +0000
+Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n15so2348654wiw.5
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
+ :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
+ bh=mq4FirKfBvf+fLRTKHuX1+Dyv1ob9VPL5JYPLQnplEk=;
+ b=S401YL8E3HJaU/NL4BIY3Wnm+oyt+jxrbiIBPnT9RCkXVBigJjS725OQZMivcWvrDW
+ V90U4hDSb3EoPcH0Q7HSGStN6A8poBSIEltnW/ROtU/vLWvZaqbCdRS8CVPL9gvoIOOI
+ fjVJ4jumPxdYH+s2KfPtKk5izLePK+pQl1iSZerV+WId0tDesHv5+cOhQsi9LnruL9ve
+ VYVX3NTH51lhOkx/FVj+3BAMaAhD7OcEE/Bzv+wUOM5WYUR0hH+31UbuemWUcGrcqYB+
+ h4h7tSoaX++BcGEZ79dARGCqxrs2AK9+znbwDtibYkZ9xwcjXZ5P+8dPIRl25+Ex8mbE
+ Sfuw==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzK4dCqE4YsC3cuS8qWKJ9PMxcbXGdb1Xag3KLpq4bgX9VugIlbNKhYDVxke2xw5E+TBth
+X-Received: by 10.194.118.163 with SMTP id kn3mr1854480wjb.77.1394638565321;
+ Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.194.82.197 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <53202D51.8010008@plan99.net>
+References: <CANAnSg3Bt0e7CfUcJXe96xhU6nqif9ey_vurZMZkSa9OHjHStw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABsx9T0SMi6Gp4JY=CpHxLEu5pVkvDmnug7PsY7m_dvtT7khzg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <531DFDF8.80008@gmail.com> <531E52FE.5090107@jerviss.org>
+ <531E5454.1030601@gmail.com>
+ <CAJHLa0NZkzQQvMxgCJAJGT=Yn6vrVNK8Bg7RAfAjctpnrfg5zA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABsx9T3eViYDsEmLm7ceimJNwci3mCOxWoVnVZHrqp7pDmm0+g@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANAnSg2kzPF0886PsQW8chzsWi6Urp+=-x+9bbv8Mv6hmpvBPw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAJHLa0Mu2kiv3CCme7BPwzWtT++PNLQ2aAKdLyA8LFTtXEg9fg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABsx9T0Lvg84qFVRbc7Ef4vZEQj9eO7Jhup5PTRLLeuJFvXi-w@mail.gmail.com>
+ <4fca6b510dd57d2f92affeb988d2ee5d.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
+ <531FAA55.2020108@xeno-genesis.com> <531FC808.7060709@gmail.com>
+ <9A6499BC-E546-45CC-A7EF-5182FC86052D@gmail.com>
+ <53202D51.8010008@plan99.net>
+From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
+Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:35:45 -0400
+Message-ID: <CAJHLa0OuXyEz6gcq_dQKmGjJQf3cJjFyzjb38RCB3E6-wMLJ0g@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1WNlCV-0005Pi-KM
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol?
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:36:12 -0000
+
+On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
+> CoinVault is also using a partially signed transaction format whereby
+> 0-length placeholders are used for missing signatures in the transaction
+> scripts.
+>
+> I don't know how you are implementing this/what framework you're using, but
+> I suggest using placeholders that are the length of an actual expected
+> signature, at least when forming the transaction. This is what bitcoinj will
+> do because otherwise you could end up miscalculating the fee, which is based
+> on the final size. See TransactionSignature.dummy() in the API.
+
+The zero-length placeholder is not a new invention.
+
+This is what bitcoind produces and expects by default, for a partially
+signed transaction.
+
+--
+Jeff Garzik
+Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
+BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
+
+