diff options
| author | Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> | 2014-12-29 22:36:48 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2014-12-29 22:39:47 +0000 |
| commit | f47716247ce473164e11cd5213e88736d2140aac (patch) | |
| tree | 736c99a5f1fa49f66d8c4cd2cafaa14f315945e1 | |
| parent | 6ead08b27402a13e3ab7b81e48bd1b3139e44d66 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-f47716247ce473164e11cd5213e88736d2140aac.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-f47716247ce473164e11cd5213e88736d2140aac.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP: Voluntary deposit bonds
| -rw-r--r-- | 2b/0147a94cce4401fcb4ba756a1a2daa9013ecae | 71 |
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/2b/0147a94cce4401fcb4ba756a1a2daa9013ecae b/2b/0147a94cce4401fcb4ba756a1a2daa9013ecae new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38ec84171 --- /dev/null +++ b/2b/0147a94cce4401fcb4ba756a1a2daa9013ecae @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1Y5iyZ-0004P8-31 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of dashjr.org + designates 85.234.147.28 as permitted sender) + client-ip=85.234.147.28; envelope-from=luke@dashjr.org; + helo=zinan.dashjr.org; +Received: from 85-234-147-28.static.as29550.net ([85.234.147.28] + helo=zinan.dashjr.org) + by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1Y5iyX-0002iW-QD for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 +0000 +Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown + [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) + (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) + by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E515C1086896; + Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:36:50 +0000 (UTC) +X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net::hRPwdzPpGWAd+124:fcCOY +X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:mike@plan99.net::AgSgGh4BEeFLLFCj:bpEAW +X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:sergiolerner@certimix.com::RRx8kE8R9qDZYH7h:bB9w/ +From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> +To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:36:48 +0000 +User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14.27-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) +References: <54A1A99E.1020604@certimix.com> + <CANEZrP0zVTVdDWZCUk9wvcuAjBi4Eq+a8SQP4-R5aKrxDw_xMA@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0zVTVdDWZCUk9wvcuAjBi4Eq+a8SQP4-R5aKrxDw_xMA@mail.gmail.com> +X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F +X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F +X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: Text/Plain; + charset="iso-8859-15" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Message-Id: <201412292236.49596.luke@dashjr.org> +X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record +X-Headers-End: 1Y5iyX-0002iW-QD +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP: Voluntary deposit bonds +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 -0000 + +On Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10:20 PM Mike Hearn wrote: +> How does adding inputs to a coinbase differ from just having pay-to-fee +> transactions in the block? + +Pay-to-fee transactions can be "stolen" by another block at the same or +greater height. Additional inputs to the generation transaction are tied to +that block alone. + +Luke + + |