summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>2014-08-05 21:01:51 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2014-08-06 04:01:55 +0000
commitf26f35d27d37f185f10acfcd39294a0fddac4179 (patch)
treefa90a6c55440b19f80d63f200bf1eb670e420f20
parentecf974f82671102f97d7410c5cf10cbf001e67ca (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-f26f35d27d37f185f10acfcd39294a0fddac4179.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-f26f35d27d37f185f10acfcd39294a0fddac4179.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] deterministic transaction expiration
-rw-r--r--f2/5e745e6501f9efbf3c1819a5f78b8286e91d6482
1 files changed, 82 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/f2/5e745e6501f9efbf3c1819a5f78b8286e91d64 b/f2/5e745e6501f9efbf3c1819a5f78b8286e91d64
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f9d85a923
--- /dev/null
+++ b/f2/5e745e6501f9efbf3c1819a5f78b8286e91d64
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <tomh@thinlink.com>) id 1XEsQF-000342-Fi
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 06 Aug 2014 04:01:55 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48])
+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1XEsQE-0005pi-D9
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 06 Aug 2014 04:01:55 +0000
+Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id et14so2642033pad.35
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
+ :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
+ :content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=G1EWHFavRCIfnLTmNL0QfS00MflqnCi/d44F3DzcVEc=;
+ b=GZubvNxXQpmUWgKMtZddDDba1HxlKA9AdjoNtiUZPR1YDZn3T36CN1AsyxH908x1L0
+ 5jXCAuW2X5Ei0gJ+1Oe3Bv1KpZDYxqdcyuv9suX0sxouWaEYLBQviT+tkjgnhD2lNHeu
+ 475TCSITyllVbr5HBy/cFGRHipo7qCzAwliG4Wz1tHf5k9UmSBSPLOHmoUyc9TQ8bjax
+ 9cgQHhtgGzW49LNTRaWtny0R+EDUCYwzWed53aFE1udS1UXXmR1KR2N3O9L/ZiHrvGZC
+ scjD/xerVfZLksGR3s48vaQk7IzlDLlRW4HKMX8+V34RKcjQdxfysYNlCK/RJ+LieXcY
+ 7fQA==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlFfprGQbjwz9yqWy7ZjCG9jLYpdAXhaxJKDQcwViMsooo+Gye64HJt958SB0spQ3bIZPF1
+X-Received: by 10.70.140.13 with SMTP id rc13mr8720053pdb.127.1407297708570;
+ Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-6-44-248.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net.
+ [99.6.44.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
+ vu7sm12687334pab.34.2014.08.05.21.01.47
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+ (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
+ Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
+Message-ID: <53E1A8AF.4030206@thinlink.com>
+Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:01:51 -0700
+From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
+ rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+References: <CA+iPb=HkxeVPF0SynxCPgUkq4msrdfayFrVNFjzg29rFwqXv1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHLa0O2wFq2Vs5Bes_8x1q_j0VC+U4DQkx=6GqT8w5e8Lh5Qg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CA+iPb=ET+A-qB8TgPX8D-ut1DWnq9tZJ=14igfRVWO6eog6Xgw@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CA+iPb=ET+A-qB8TgPX8D-ut1DWnq9tZJ=14igfRVWO6eog6Xgw@mail.gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+X-Headers-End: 1XEsQE-0005pi-D9
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] deterministic transaction expiration
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 04:01:55 -0000
+
+On 8/5/2014 12:10 PM, Kaz Wesley wrote:
+> Any approach based on beginning a transaction expiry countdown when a
+> transaction is received (as in mempool janitor) seems unviable to me:
+> once a node has forgotten a transaction, it must be susceptible to
+> reaccepting it;
+
+It's hard to argue with that logic.
+
+If nLockTime is used for expiration, transaction creator can't lie to
+help tx live longer without pushing initial confirmation eligibility
+into the future. Very pretty. It would also enable "fill or kill"
+transactions with a backdated nLockTime, which must be confirmed in a
+few blocks, or start vanishing from mempools.
+
+
+