summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>2015-08-19 09:21:36 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-19 16:21:58 +0000
commitedb5aa898be25ce305fdc5ba70b9d522845d09bb (patch)
tree1cff817cc393d51fd3ab180f715b592768d4299b
parent101f16840ed9968ca39eaf0b570ce4f71369ab52 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-edb5aa898be25ce305fdc5ba70b9d522845d09bb.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-edb5aa898be25ce305fdc5ba70b9d522845d09bb.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for relative locktime
-rw-r--r--48/bb05592022881a4cbfaa2797636841f581ca05163
1 files changed, 163 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/48/bb05592022881a4cbfaa2797636841f581ca05 b/48/bb05592022881a4cbfaa2797636841f581ca05
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f96869bc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/48/bb05592022881a4cbfaa2797636841f581ca05
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+Return-Path: <mark@friedenbach.org>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E280A7F
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com
+ [209.85.223.171])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE5F63
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:21:57 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by iods203 with SMTP id s203so14989354iod.0
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
+ :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
+ bh=Dwi6boi52PbE4TprngUHAxwHCeg6e5zYFo6ZgokDr88=;
+ b=PsrKhD5fAWeb2MAUSrd0LttBxinfjwNsLK+tH2AbrlnKGlm452ihczcj24E2bL7LbY
+ DHB9LaBkfgQz2VQtQm3KhoBT0T+5irzDpTHyaPltRRC93uuEu8OZ8z94k7VkaPyxGGDf
+ Ylcm+LaVdgyQdiLBKB2oCEnFfEKhibxavw/reqDdhmSUwbmX3Jz/maZ5xp5eF3K+SeYg
+ bcluYNxsvzlbrmKhg3V8tbGEbrBGv4VYT5zmXJifOHEB4lsTn9z4tHZZYGXBPUfcX8XU
+ JSbu/Su6WEAXiiAPwAsJc0nJC7oR/jK5MxLP4cAGB8Y9EUXvSHZnWOhzEy7BeBUyYB8T
+ B0Pg==
+X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm497eFn5dyekrhoe3CcCGYCbPNqc4DWBYEQUAdax6fgWwLxI09SY7xLlQ1/VPwHwOM7NvH
+X-Received: by 10.107.11.67 with SMTP id v64mr14854490ioi.105.1440001316394;
+ Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.107.138.14 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
+X-Originating-IP: [50.0.37.37]
+In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADJgMzv8G3EqLBwEYRHJZ+fO_Jwzy0koi2pJ_iNRkXmoVarGcg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
+Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:21:36 -0700
+Message-ID: <CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
+To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f9694f0b7db051dac6eab
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,UC_GIBBERISH_OBFU autolearn=no version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
+ relative locktime
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:21:58 -0000
+
+--001a113f9694f0b7db051dac6eab
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so far only Jorge
+has spoken up. I opted for this detail during implementation in order to
+preserve existing semantics, even if those semantics are not commonly used.
+This was the conservative choice, driven in part because I didn't want the
+proposal to be held up by the other side saying "this is confusing because
+it changes how sequence numbers work! it used to count up but now it counts
+down!"
+
+I can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went with the
+conservative choice of not messing with existing semantics. However if
+there is strong preferences from _multiple_ people on this matter it is not
+too late to change. If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
+
+On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <
+bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+
+> I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
+>
+>
+> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
+> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+> > Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and also a pull request f=
+or
+> > the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].
+> >
+> > [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
+> > [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
+> >
+> >
+> > _______________________________________________
+> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
+> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
+> >
+> _______________________________________________
+> bitcoin-dev mailing list
+> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
+>
+
+--001a113f9694f0b7db051dac6eab
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), b=
+ut so far only Jorge has spoken up. I opted for this detail during implemen=
+tation in order to preserve existing semantics, even if those semantics are=
+ not commonly used. This was the conservative choice, driven in part becaus=
+e I didn&#39;t want the proposal to be held up by the other side saying &qu=
+ot;this is confusing because it changes how sequence numbers work! it used =
+to count up but now it counts down!&quot;<br><br></div>I can see both sides=
+ and as I said I&#39;m indifferent, so I went with the conservative choice =
+of not messing with existing semantics. However if there is strong preferen=
+ces from _multiple_ people on this matter it is not too late to change. If =
+anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.<br></div><div class=3D"g=
+mail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM,=
+ Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists=
+.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
+rg</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
+in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I repeated my ni=
+t on <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179" rel=3D"noreferrer=
+" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
+<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
+<br>
+On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev<br>
+&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@li=
+sts.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
+&gt; Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and also a pull request =
+for<br>
+&gt; the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; [1] <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179" rel=3D"norefe=
+rrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
+&gt; [2] <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564" rel=3D"no=
+referrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564</a=
+><br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt;<br>
+</div></div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">&gt; __________________=
+_____________________________<br>
+&gt; bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
+&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@l=
+ists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
+&gt; <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-=
+dev" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org=
+/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
+&gt;<br>
+_______________________________________________<br>
+bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
+<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
+linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
+<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
+rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
+man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
+</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
+
+--001a113f9694f0b7db051dac6eab--
+