+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]

+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)

+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)

+ (envelope-from <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>) id 1XCpx6-0003WT-Gu

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:59:24 +0000

+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com

+ designates 209.85.192.48 as permitted sender)

+ client-ip=209.85.192.48; envelope-from=jameson.lopp@gmail.com;

+ helo=mail-qg0-f48.google.com;

+Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com ([209.85.192.48])

+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)

+ (Exim 4.76) id 1XCpx5-0007MD-DN

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:59:24 +0000

+Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so3656177qgf.21

+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;

+ Thu, 31 Jul 2014 05:59:17 -0700 (PDT)

+X-Received: by 10.140.39.164 with SMTP id v33mr2304321qgv.39.1406811557258;

+ Thu, 31 Jul 2014 05:59:17 -0700 (PDT)

+Received: from [192.168.119.214] (BRONTO-SOFT.car1.Raleigh1.Level3.net.

+ [4.59.160.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id

+ b104sm5880299qga.24.2014.07.31.05.59.16

+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);

+ Thu, 31 Jul 2014 05:59:16 -0700 (PDT)

+Message-ID: <53DA3DA5.1040102@gmail.com>

+Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:59:17 -0400

+From: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>

+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;

+ rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+References: <CAJHLa0O1EP8aUn4KLbo3OvzjgVfF8onrMjNnkRAnuWHwbofWBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+s+GJDUbm7Z9FeQr1otuEPXn0RRq+KL=kS3GJT3j3TeWz_n5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBhmkcW-7TYQ7TxAYvMsLrckcja+wPDow80a9Yoo1KdgMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+ZByEFqBmUvA_ZO_8MzaYvfUopHY1x=rGaMeq8fL4_2q1uJg@mail.gmail.com>

+ <CANEZrP2HHPUnsymDnRLd=-Ox-RD8RezM7TvpYeAw_np4JM4Bdw@mail.gmail.com>

+In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2HHPUnsymDnRLd=-Ox-RD8RezM7TvpYeAw_np4JM4Bdw@mail.gmail.com>

+X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)

+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.

+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for

+ sender-domain

+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider

+ (jameson.lopp[at]gmail.com)

+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record

+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from

+ author's domain

+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,

+ not necessarily valid

+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

+X-Headers-End: 1XCpx5-0007MD-DN

+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Abusive and broken bitcoin seeders

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:59:24 -0000

+

+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

+Hash: SHA1

+

+I may be able to provide some insight regarding request volume / abuse via my public node at http://statoshi.info

+

+My node receives a 'getaddr' request about every 50 seconds: http://i.imgur.com/XEpnWfG.png

+

+In terms of the 'addr' messages that it sends out, the volume is also low. This graph has 'inv' and 'tx' sent messages for comparison. http://i.imgur.com/keyitsS.png

+

+Now, these are just message volume and not actual resource usage, but I have a feeling that 'getaddr' requests are not resource intensive since it shouldn't be reading from disk. I could look into adding timing metrics around these requests if you think it could be useful.

+

+- - Jameson

+

+On 07/31/2014 06:37 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:

+>>

+>> I suspect it is something that is going to have to be dealt with in the

+>> future (I just don't know how yet).

+>>

+>

+> The web has managed to survive despite constant fast crawls being the norm

+> for the past 10 years or so. I wouldn't worry too much about this unless

+> you can prove that a big chunk of your nodes resources are going to

+> answering ver queries.

+>

+>

+>

+> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

+> Infragistics Professional

+> Build stunning WinForms apps today!

+> Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.

+> Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.

+> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

+>

+>

+>

+> _______________________________________________

+> Bitcoin-development mailing list

+> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

+>

+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

+Version: GnuPG v1

+Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

+

+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT2j2lAAoJEIch3FSFNiDcWqIH/i0W21cYFHyQZItSkyHezBER

+ExjudrLuXvTuRc/9b1OG7lJpK7IEYpCn0xXHGP3gv8gihq6lVEdZCFMXGWxU+eDv

+ECXppTTCUkofUjVInbU91eagXeRzK0UTbTrp2++hfLQIAv99B8mgSdoEcopP42Fd

+G197p/273lAPGVmNF31YPUcIbrhj0IzsiR1QaEEf1FEelaJ7MmU7YsUFUglajTqk

+6+Uzcr6RcwLKAWVFAOA6VOeVwAMOQMwsniUAx6bYbqvgSHzRTllDDWW5rTaKh9+O

+rIhA3LvHpLh37xqTs6EvJb2Kn823e4Ax4Eoz3wqVvAyjNqWHRPjlXdXentHFN4Q=

+=R+Z1

+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

+

+