diff options
| author | Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> | 2015-05-28 14:21:48 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-05-28 18:21:56 +0000 |
| commit | e8751b8b32666b18af021faf092daf8ccdd09fe6 (patch) | |
| tree | 3761a00ff83dbd2f313ca0abe555c5e04d7bb1dd | |
| parent | 6701cbd48f1a674bca4f9a0f5f4ab128c54770cc (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-e8751b8b32666b18af021faf092daf8ccdd09fe6.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e8751b8b32666b18af021faf092daf8ccdd09fe6.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction
| -rw-r--r-- | 77/82e7a79002afa47dabb159de6b906163230d34 | 122 |
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/77/82e7a79002afa47dabb159de6b906163230d34 b/77/82e7a79002afa47dabb159de6b906163230d34 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b2ed8c66a --- /dev/null +++ b/77/82e7a79002afa47dabb159de6b906163230d34 @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Yy2RI-00065J-SD + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 28 May 2015 18:21:56 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.217.172; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; + helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com; +Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1Yy2RH-0002R8-G4 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 28 May 2015 18:21:56 +0000 +Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2so33936801lbb.3 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Thu, 28 May 2015 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.152.4.72 with SMTP id i8mr4250559lai.32.1432837309193; Thu, + 28 May 2015 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:21:48 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBhuHrMHZym8xQ2-dMknR4zdM=ZULcnZ-fcGnKLserDd-A@mail.gmail.com> +References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator> + <CABsx9T3-zxCAagAS0megd06xvG5n-3tUL9NUK9TT3vt7XNL9Tg@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP3VCaFsW4+gPm2kCJ9z7oVUZYVaeNf=_cJWEWwh4ZxiPQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABsx9T21zjHyO-nh1aSBM3z4Bg015O0rOfYq7=Sy4mf=QxUVQA@mail.gmail.com> + <COL131-DS24FC87C7C6622E23F5EF58CDCA0@phx.gbl> + <CAPg+sBhuHrMHZym8xQ2-dMknR4zdM=ZULcnZ-fcGnKLserDd-A@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:21:48 -0400 +Message-ID: <CABsx9T06sk8srz016tfgxcYrn9Ebc33Oj95tK7i4D1i0=+p9rA@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01494248d5e6f10517286ed3 +X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1Yy2RH-0002R8-G4 +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB + stepfunction +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:21:56 -0000 + +--089e01494248d5e6f10517286ed3 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> +wrote: + +> I personally think the block size should increase, by the way, but only if +> we can do it under a policy of doing it after technological growth has been +> shown to be sufficient to support it without increased risk. +> +> Can you be more specific about this? What risks are you worried about? + +I've tried to cover all that I've heard about in my blog posts about why I +think the risks of 20MB blocks are outweighed by the benefits, am I missing +something? + (blog posts are linked from +http://gavinandresen.ninja/time-to-roll-out-bigger-blocks ) + +There is the "a sudden jump to a 20MB max might have unforseen +consequences" risk that I don't address, but a dynamic increase would fix +that. + +-- +-- +Gavin Andresen + +--089e01494248d5e6f10517286ed3 +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T= +hu, May 28, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Pieter Wuille <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D= +"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuille@gmail.com<= +/a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:= +0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);= +border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><p dir=3D"ltr">I= + personally think the block size should increase, by the way, but only if w= +e can do it under a policy of doing it after technological growth has been = +shown to be sufficient to support it without increased risk.<br></p></span>= +<span class=3D""><font color=3D"#888888"> +<p dir=3D"ltr"></p></font></span></blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_ext= +ra">Can you be more specific about this? What risks are you worried about?<= +/div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I'= +ve tried to cover all that I've heard about in my blog posts about why = +I think the risks of 20MB blocks are outweighed by the benefits, am I missi= +ng something?</div><div>=C2=A0 (blog posts are linked from=C2=A0<a href=3D"= +http://gavinandresen.ninja/time-to-roll-out-bigger-blocks">http://gavinandr= +esen.ninja/time-to-roll-out-bigger-blocks</a> )</div><div><br></div><div>Th= +ere is the "a sudden jump to a 20MB max might have unforseen consequen= +ces" risk that I don't address, but a dynamic increase would fix t= +hat.</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Gavin = +Andresen<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><br></div> +</div></div> + +--089e01494248d5e6f10517286ed3-- + + |