summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLuke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>2013-03-23 18:27:20 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2013-03-23 18:27:40 +0000
commite7da5c9c94560c1a42388d4c455d33190836bfff (patch)
tree4b91f72f8d34bfd1c74d396587d23db4a40a548a
parenta2bacbbfb342c22613dd724a5a0311aefc6a2a23 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-e7da5c9c94560c1a42388d4c455d33190836bfff.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-e7da5c9c94560c1a42388d4c455d33190836bfff.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Upcoming network event: block v2 lock-in
-rw-r--r--4c/86fb2b3e253317fe1c8bc8ddbb62533c63884968
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/4c/86fb2b3e253317fe1c8bc8ddbb62533c638849 b/4c/86fb2b3e253317fe1c8bc8ddbb62533c638849
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60b3a833d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/4c/86fb2b3e253317fe1c8bc8ddbb62533c638849
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1UJTAK-0007N8-Uf
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:40 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1UJTAJ-00067V-JH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:40 +0000
+Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.142.26])
+ (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
+ by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD68627A2966;
+ Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:31 +0000 (UTC)
+From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
+To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
+Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:20 +0000
+User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.3-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; )
+References: <CA+8xBpcwLUt=RBYynbQDwY2Bv1keCPy0pdXP4+8CG-wqvrxOCA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <201303231751.48969.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <CA+8xBpdSHxbzSZenTCLrh7yfCWMLXokbdupTkjpU0V2+B1YV3w@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpdSHxbzSZenTCLrh7yfCWMLXokbdupTkjpU0V2+B1YV3w@mail.gmail.com>
+X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
+X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
+X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: Text/Plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-1"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Message-Id: <201303231827.23273.luke@dashjr.org>
+X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+X-Headers-End: 1UJTAJ-00067V-JH
+Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Upcoming network event: block v2 lock-in
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:41 -0000
+
+On Saturday, March 23, 2013 6:21:32 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
+> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
+> > bitcoind is nowhere in the implementation of the miner end of BIP 34.
+>
+> Again, not strictly true.
+>
+> bitcoind's 'getblocktemplate' RPC call used by some supplies the block
+> version, selects transactions for the miner, and other tasks integral
+> to the implementation of the miner and BIP 34.
+
+Transaction selection and everything else bitcoind does, is irrelevant to BIP
+34. It is incompatible with getblocktemplate for coinbase-creating software to
+produce v2 blocks without implementing BIP 34 themselves, even if the upstream
+GBT server specifies it.
+
+