diff options
| author | Jim Phillips <jim@ergophobia.org> | 2015-05-09 14:05:36 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-05-09 19:06:13 +0000 |
| commit | e77730e89319a832d094d8fa653029f9e9743d95 (patch) | |
| tree | cf902057393aba8aebe0690db637b99e352fcbaa | |
| parent | 1296df110e4b2af524d2f23b138a487d3a23e88a (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-e77730e89319a832d094d8fa653029f9e9743d95.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e77730e89319a832d094d8fa653029f9e9743d95.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the UTXO database
| -rw-r--r-- | 87/17818c2a4f4b8dde6e73c4ec85815bc1a5c857 | 96 |
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/87/17818c2a4f4b8dde6e73c4ec85815bc1a5c857 b/87/17818c2a4f4b8dde6e73c4ec85815bc1a5c857 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f367da7e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/87/17818c2a4f4b8dde6e73c4ec85815bc1a5c857 @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <jim@ergophobia.org>) id 1YrA4j-0005oK-QQ + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1YrA4i-0007NX-Hs + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 +0000 +Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so97542304wgy.2 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Sat, 09 May 2015 12:06:06 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; + bh=WVAdmXCryZ24DKHZsZo997FNnHbVTu5526dK4l/410c=; + b=j8FRP4+BSeDDQ29htg3AdiDyKQBPpM1Wkfk23KXEV+aRJQ0LtJbU6oKKiz74TXRYtx + drTTPV2YXVh6XL+RQ24Ujc4qNdDha2pMntV/Uwpzt2uxWbVI+UqUyQRZIT8E26crEZ5Y + +CHIICXuZLFyCLUYM4dxg+LX3otHvKhoOoAUgQbwtnhZIlNWM6cuHrFzsHhjoi/Tmkan + KYBgHM/3GaULvtI+q0SQ7k7gPFJsORz2NPn0v7f9YUAeup33YLl++mbgKGEmYHfU9a0W + fMxQVfOlyIv1g4u2T9L5Enc6H+QlcW3ClH9HwfO9aXDpTg0s5Kr78emYQYu5vVF0rm5S + pIZg== +X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzeORTGXnSxh1hdBFuI8DU/EYfUfga5POcog0OYq8v1ElOR1SMCgSUabsc+2fun/s+QqWL +X-Received: by 10.180.74.208 with SMTP id w16mr6660651wiv.31.1431198366521; + Sat, 09 May 2015 12:06:06 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.194.246.69 with HTTP; Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:36 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <millgi$3uv$1@ger.gmane.org> +References: <CANe1mWzBy8-C+CWfwaOLxJ2wokjy8ytQUh2TkRY_Ummn1BpPzw@mail.gmail.com> + <millgi$3uv$1@ger.gmane.org> +From: Jim Phillips <jim@ergophobia.org> +Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 14:05:36 -0500 +Message-ID: <CANe1mWzEypArb_qjvYFJqk-4hQGH+03et8Zot=ZJYT9pYjrgTA@mail.gmail.com> +To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a +X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message +X-Headers-End: 1YrA4i-0007NX-Hs +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A suggestion for reducing the size of the + UTXO database +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 19:06:13 -0000 + +--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 + +On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> +wrote: + +> Actually your assumption is wrong. Bitcoin Wallet (and I think most, if +> not all, other bitcoinj based wallets) picks UTXO by age, in order to +> maximize priority. So it keeps the number of UTXOs low, though not as +> low as if it would always pick *all* UTXOs. +> +> Is it not fair to say though that UTXO database growth is not considered +when selecting the UTXOs to use? And that size of transaction is a priority +if not the top priority? + +--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a +Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S= +at, May 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andreas Schildbach <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a hre= +f=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de" target=3D"_blank">andreas@schildbach.de<= +/a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:= +0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Actually your assum= +ption is wrong. Bitcoin Wallet (and I think most, if<br> +not all, other bitcoinj based wallets) picks UTXO by age, in order to<br> +maximize priority. So it keeps the number of UTXOs low, though not as<br> +low as if it would always pick *all* UTXOs.<br> +<div><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div>Is it not fair to = +say though that UTXO database growth is not considered when selecting the U= +TXOs to use? And that size of transaction is a priority if not the top prio= +rity?=C2=A0</div></div></div></div> + +--f46d043892173d6fed0515aad64a-- + + |