diff options
| author | Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> | 2015-08-17 19:15:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-17 17:15:43 +0000 |
| commit | e7365ae9c7428df8ab026182eb1fc3a362762fd8 (patch) | |
| tree | eec8862fca220feed8a97811f53108b01ab88b87 | |
| parent | a9e4958d800a07bdecfafba9ec451d56e39aad9f (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-e7365ae9c7428df8ab026182eb1fc3a362762fd8.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e7365ae9c7428df8ab026182eb1fc3a362762fd8.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
| -rw-r--r-- | 5b/cdfdcc2ca6603b35bdb09d8958300dfb354d63 | 110 |
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/5b/cdfdcc2ca6603b35bdb09d8958300dfb354d63 b/5b/cdfdcc2ca6603b35bdb09d8958300dfb354d63 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba67d0b73 --- /dev/null +++ b/5b/cdfdcc2ca6603b35bdb09d8958300dfb354d63 @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D8B86 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:15:43 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com + [209.85.215.47]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0FD13F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:15:41 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so83420844lag.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:15:39 -0700 (PDT) +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20130820; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date + :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type + :content-transfer-encoding; + bh=VDZioT4Ww82iQ3rC1q4GFns6wNjpPK4yyMoI1n4PgMc=; + b=CjDOsNqfdqcfXNBjz/TP+tA+lN6TB4pIG64M2aOWsHtkgoXhpLDB/yJvDBf4jt1vCa + GBRzsBLiiNhIGeqQgCQ9OcqhckL2qFRrK5QkKM4gLju92u1x1D0bmuyZLus/bhyKVxev + GNCt4Qff0Ui2Agt8L3MnmnipOQ5JhNkHDenHtHCslgJBx1AJdwNe5GATvsdgbgGG5mkD + 9nW6FTgiFhJw9unYY2sYzRqcG8s59Gy6jrSmpGDB39v/r6bKhnz+Rzei5xrmRNAilX3c + 6qGc98Hpnk71e9UhIeYakGxiKEqXmY0WD1dZBPi8X5yw5So+CH0E8PtHVK6tkW8/BDuJ + pD/Q== +X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoYdLZ32eWO3hsxhAe2WvrRmw2jtF1GHjw+V90XSfbQsZ8cq367N4vi/90K24AZLWFVnBI +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.153.7.66 with SMTP id da2mr1883023lad.117.1439831739562; + Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:15:39 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:15:39 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <55D21356.4010302@olivere.de> +References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04> + <55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de> + <CABm2gDrQTSyJUDWzO5FEy8GD76+coN7tM--8rhC7i0vfmUf0Qw@mail.gmail.com> + <55D1CAAF.6010400@olivere.de> + <CABm2gDqNUzqXNjih0TkCyAxUjWTcdHFsdYJYT9wriy7wDx3teg@mail.gmail.com> + <55D21356.4010302@olivere.de> +Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:15:39 +0200 +Message-ID: <CABm2gDpLB+hBy0AA3oPseOjq03k7c9KNCSHkyq+Tz72fGcsvUA@mail.gmail.com> +From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc> +To: Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:15:43 -0000 + +On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de> wrote= +: +> Am 17.08.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Jorge Tim=C3=B3n: +>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de> wr= +ote: +>>> Am 17.08.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Jorge Tim=C3=B3n: +>>>> +>>>> On Aug 17, 2015 1:40 PM, "Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev" +>>>> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +>>>> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: +>>>>> That made it to the news and is now discussed in various places. Coul= +d +>>>>> you please delete Satoshis old email addresses from the list and bloc= +k +>>>>> them? Sorry to post this to all members but I can't find an owner for +>>>>> this list. +>>>> +>>>> Why should we block any email address? +>>> +>>> To avoid such discussions. +>> +>> You mean to avoid discussions about his authenticity? +>> Should that matter at all? +>> Does the content of the post matter less than its author? +> +> It just creates confusion. Particularly in the media. I also find it +> unfair if people abuses Satoshi's name to submit their personal views on +> an issue. + +Yes, people have been abusing his name in the block size debate to +present their own personal views, almost from the beginning, and that +has been very annoying. +But I don't remember you proposing to block their emails from the list +in those occasions. +For all I know this could have been the real Satoshi. But I just +maintain what I've said when arguments of authority (an old fallacy) +have been used: only the arguments matter, not who makes them (which +is also what logic says). +Maybe the people using the arguments of authority actually care about +whether the author is Satoshi or not to determine what they think +about what the content says. +But I personally don't care: I can say that I agree with what the post +says no matter if it is written by Satoshi or someone else (because +the identity of the author doesn't change what I think of the +content). + |