summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>2021-10-16 23:23:15 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2021-10-16 23:23:36 +0000
commite5bd0bcff962896ba552e23b07c26bc0ba35fdcd (patch)
tree97704dc74d84514229e758a84902b6cc181946cc
parent7db2dd3a891eff734eb127384a966c4301182925 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-e5bd0bcff962896ba552e23b07c26bc0ba35fdcd.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-e5bd0bcff962896ba552e23b07c26bc0ba35fdcd.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting
-rw-r--r--d1/5588a4e1569a164ac79fd02aea0d5eb5337637102
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/d1/5588a4e1569a164ac79fd02aea0d5eb5337637 b/d1/5588a4e1569a164ac79fd02aea0d5eb5337637
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..70d56862b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d1/5588a4e1569a164ac79fd02aea0d5eb5337637
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
+ by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB042C000D
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:36 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+ by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9098332A
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:36 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -1.601
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
+ FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
+ autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
+Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
+ dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
+Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id lC6WZZpRhMH1
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
+Received: from mail-4327.protonmail.ch (mail-4327.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.27])
+ by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD17483313
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-0301.mail-europe.com (mail-0301.mail-europe.com
+ [188.165.51.139])
+ (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
+ key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
+ (No client certificate requested)
+ by mail-4321.protonmail.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HWzj13P2Cz4x4rl
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:33 +0000 (UTC)
+Authentication-Results: mail-4321.protonmail.ch;
+ dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
+ header.b="EPg9c4wu"
+Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:15 +0000
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
+ s=protonmail; t=1634426602;
+ bh=AffZz6ohRc9sTzrhqDKhccgxOFGzsSMCGfK2hhEf0VM=;
+ h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
+ b=EPg9c4wuaVYCsjVBzv9esIjdXOAMUnExKn9E2liP1G73WE9DbtqvJsBcqMHw9Cp2c
+ 1FGAUxhIBZLgf9kXJAhpIg3opD5nwOdIBBgG2kyKtxecijqPRj0eQ3izcuS9gzexuV
+ hIYzPysqGjzJ1a0Fc9MgYEiXWdiHNEA93bZcJPAE=
+To: "vjudeu@gazeta.pl" <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>
+From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
+Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
+Message-ID: <eAo_By_Oe44ra6anVBlZg2UbfKfzhZ1b1vtaF0NuIjdJcB_niagHBS-SoU2qcLzjDj8Kuo67O_FnBSuIgskAi2_fCsLE6_d4SwWq9skHuQI=@protonmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <143903239-0c7634127ba6ddee7e69b14740b993cd@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
+References: <143903239-0c7634127ba6ddee7e69b14740b993cd@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 23:23:36 -0000
+
+Good morning vjudeu,
+
+> > What happens if a series of blocks has a timestamp of 0xFFFFFFFF at the=
+ appropriate time?
+>
+> The chain will halt for all old clients, because there is no 32-bit value=
+ greater than 0xffffffff.
+>
+> > 1. Is not violated, since "not lower than" means "greater than or equa=
+l to"
+>
+> No, because it has to be strictly "greater than" in the Bitcoin Core sour=
+ce code, it is rejected when it is "lower or equal to", see:https://github.=
+com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/6f0cbc75be7644c276650fd98bfdb6358b827399/src/valid=
+ation.cpp#L3089-L3094
+
+Then starting at Unix Epoch 0x80000000, post-softfork nodes just increment =
+the timestamp by 1 on each new block.
+This just kicks the can since that then imposes a limit on the maximum numb=
+er of blocks, but at least the unit is now ~10 minutes instead of 1 second,=
+ a massive x600 increase in the amount of time we are forced to hardfork.
+
+On the other hand, this does imply that the difficulty calculation will bec=
+ome astronomically and ludicrously high, since pre-softfork nodes will thin=
+k that blocks are arriving at the rate of 1 per second, so ...
+
+Regards,
+ZmnSCPxj
+