summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>2012-02-01 09:48:13 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2012-02-01 09:48:22 +0000
commite41d367ed38893ab94a98703514f80a2e52e2c9f (patch)
tree411224c7a24ff840caef02d5899b5fdfdf830df2
parentf4b7b6f7d55fae2117fca12a60542d4d7c700c4a (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-e41d367ed38893ab94a98703514f80a2e52e2c9f.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-e41d367ed38893ab94a98703514f80a2e52e2c9f.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP16/17 replacement
-rw-r--r--d5/ba519ae721405b86aa79c5749747e7a8875c79103
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/d5/ba519ae721405b86aa79c5749747e7a8875c79 b/d5/ba519ae721405b86aa79c5749747e7a8875c79
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..428103760
--- /dev/null
+++ b/d5/ba519ae721405b86aa79c5749747e7a8875c79
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <andyparkins@gmail.com>) id 1RsWne-0001KH-Ki
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:48:22 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.212.175; envelope-from=andyparkins@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-wi0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1RsWnd-0008M2-UZ
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:48:22 +0000
+Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so1102180wib.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:48:15 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.180.8.103 with SMTP id q7mr40601791wia.1.1328089695841;
+ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:48:15 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from dvr.localnet (mail.360visiontechnology.com. [92.42.121.178])
+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id di5sm72167627wib.3.2012.02.01.01.48.14
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
+ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:48:14 -0800 (PST)
+From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:48:13 +0000
+User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-1-686-pae; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; )
+References: <201201311651.02726.andyparkins@gmail.com>
+ <201201311158.50801.luke@dashjr.org>
+In-Reply-To: <201201311158.50801.luke@dashjr.org>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8260352.exK8TWir3u";
+ protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Message-Id: <201202010948.13169.andyparkins@gmail.com>
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (andyparkins[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1RsWnd-0008M2-UZ
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP16/17 replacement
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:48:22 -0000
+
+--nextPart8260352.exK8TWir3u
+Content-Type: Text/Plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-1"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+
+On 2012 January 31 Tuesday, Luke-Jr wrote:
+
+> Both BIP 16 and 17 are backward compatible enough that people can continue
+> to use the old clients with each other. An upgrade is only required to
+> send to (or create/receive on) the new 3...-form addresses. That being
+
+Is that true? (I'm happy to be called wrong)
+
+It doesn't seem like it to me. The new transaction types will be rejected =
+by=20
+old clients won't they? They don't pass IsStandard().
+
+
+Andy
+
+=2D-=20
+Dr Andy Parkins
+andyparkins@gmail.com
+
+--nextPart8260352.exK8TWir3u
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
+Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
+
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iEYEABECAAYFAk8pCl0ACgkQwQJ9gE9xL23/ywCguI7MQdo0YusJ0NZe/HpVzt5h
+jFIAn2dtTseD9EYvd8vqn49qi4DJG/uv
+=Wvm4
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+--nextPart8260352.exK8TWir3u--
+
+