diff options
author | Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> | 2015-02-12 21:02:10 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-02-12 20:02:37 +0000 |
commit | e0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09 (patch) | |
tree | 56d9b3d37112f64d390eff433b3b3bb5daf63a21 | |
parent | 178b2caaab7c250a3d269d3a0c343828bac61191 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-e0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-e0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
-rw-r--r-- | 92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1 | 112 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1 b/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5993ed0fa --- /dev/null +++ b/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1 @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <natanael.l@gmail.com>) id 1YLzy9-0008Ki-Ig + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 74.125.82.181 as permitted sender) + client-ip=74.125.82.181; envelope-from=natanael.l@gmail.com; + helo=mail-we0-f181.google.com; +Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]) + by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1YLzy8-0007CF-L1 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 +0000 +Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w62so12403556wes.12 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:30 -0800 (PST) +X-Received: by 10.194.95.66 with SMTP id di2mr11182259wjb.57.1423771350501; + Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:30 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.194.28.170 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:10 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <54DD046B.3070507@riseup.net> +References: <20150212064719.GA6563@savin.petertodd.org> + <CANEZrP2uVT_UqJbzyQcEbiS78T68Jj2cH7OGXv5QtYiCwArDdA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAE28kUQ87jWhq1p6RK1eKEuEP1ERxN_P2SS0=YsFEGAqRyMPLA@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP2H2T2QFZceCc=YzwwiApJy7kY7FN0LoAZODGbW12SYsw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAE28kURa8g3YTPi-GHKAt4v0csxXe=QhGhV3aQcDZGSr=Lb7RQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP2hAUsRfeXUo-DLiiRmG5uJcwFuP4=o1S6Fb7ts5Ud=bw@mail.gmail.com> + <CADJgMztrzMh8=Y6SD-JV1hpTTbGB8Y2u=59bQhGtF6h3+Ei_Ew@mail.gmail.com> + <356E7F6E-300A-4127-9885-2183FB1DE447@gmail.com> + <54DCECE4.3020802@riseup.net> + <CAJfRnm4OBEJPW-6CiY5fQ1kUYppDnTtZfLF_YpBEaB8ovzx9og@mail.gmail.com> + <54DCFBB5.3080202@gmail.com> <54DD003E.2060508@riseup.net> + <CAJfRnm5d2WcZw3eRjN-cLajwTM0iF_o7OCPc+dkv+s-p3e9nLg@mail.gmail.com> + <54DD046B.3070507@riseup.net> +From: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:02:10 +0100 +Message-ID: <CAAt2M18bXK_a3JVmnwC0rrVXwiz7iycgCnBYe1ALYXEab-V=Sw@mail.gmail.com> +To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (natanael.l[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature + 0.5 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address +X-Headers-End: 1YLzy8-0007CF-L1 +Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" + <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 -0000 + +On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Justus Ranvier +<justusranvier@riseup.net> wrote: +> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- +> Hash: SHA256 +> +> On 02/12/2015 07:47 PM, Allen Piscitello wrote: +>> Nothing will stop that. Bitcoin needs to deal with those issues, +>> not stick our heads in the sand and pretend they don't exist out of +>> benevolence. This isn't a pet solution, but the rules of the +>> protocol and what is realistically possible given the nature of +>> distributed consensus. Relying on altruism is a recipe for +>> failure. +> +> If there's a risk of fire burning down wooden buildings, pass out fire +> extinguishers and smoke detectors, not matches. +> +> The latter makes one an arsonist. + +Controlled fires is a valid tactic when necessary to reduce harm. It +is frequently used in areas with periods of extreme heat including +Australia. By burning off grids, you isolate the majority of flammable +matter into "islands". An accident fire would cause much more damage. + +Placing yourself in the way of the fire and asking them to find +another solution isn't that bright. It is only a matter of time until +a fire starts, controlled or not! If you want another solution, go +figure one out yourself! + +More to the point, it is unreasonable to knowingly expose yourself to +risk of harm and blame everybody else who isn't making your life +easier without you having to change anything. If the majority decides +that the best option to reduce harm for everybody requires that you +move out of the way and find another way to do things, you're better +off moving. + +Telling people it is fine to keep being careless when there's a fire +hazard is "the real crime", because that would cause more harm than +what those who try to get the system changed does. + + |