summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNatanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>2015-02-12 21:02:10 +0100
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-02-12 20:02:37 +0000
commite0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09 (patch)
tree56d9b3d37112f64d390eff433b3b3bb5daf63a21
parent178b2caaab7c250a3d269d3a0c343828bac61191 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-e0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-e0130065dd42289de8aa9a8099c82b33a4c18b09.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
-rw-r--r--92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1112
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1 b/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5993ed0fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/92/7dc95a6d2dad0338ef3a60977f70c6f46517d1
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <natanael.l@gmail.com>) id 1YLzy9-0008Ki-Ig
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 74.125.82.181 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=74.125.82.181; envelope-from=natanael.l@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-we0-f181.google.com;
+Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181])
+ by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1YLzy8-0007CF-L1
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 +0000
+Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w62so12403556wes.12
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:30 -0800 (PST)
+X-Received: by 10.194.95.66 with SMTP id di2mr11182259wjb.57.1423771350501;
+ Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:30 -0800 (PST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.194.28.170 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:02:10 -0800 (PST)
+In-Reply-To: <54DD046B.3070507@riseup.net>
+References: <20150212064719.GA6563@savin.petertodd.org>
+ <CANEZrP2uVT_UqJbzyQcEbiS78T68Jj2cH7OGXv5QtYiCwArDdA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAE28kUQ87jWhq1p6RK1eKEuEP1ERxN_P2SS0=YsFEGAqRyMPLA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP2H2T2QFZceCc=YzwwiApJy7kY7FN0LoAZODGbW12SYsw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAE28kURa8g3YTPi-GHKAt4v0csxXe=QhGhV3aQcDZGSr=Lb7RQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANEZrP2hAUsRfeXUo-DLiiRmG5uJcwFuP4=o1S6Fb7ts5Ud=bw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CADJgMztrzMh8=Y6SD-JV1hpTTbGB8Y2u=59bQhGtF6h3+Ei_Ew@mail.gmail.com>
+ <356E7F6E-300A-4127-9885-2183FB1DE447@gmail.com>
+ <54DCECE4.3020802@riseup.net>
+ <CAJfRnm4OBEJPW-6CiY5fQ1kUYppDnTtZfLF_YpBEaB8ovzx9og@mail.gmail.com>
+ <54DCFBB5.3080202@gmail.com> <54DD003E.2060508@riseup.net>
+ <CAJfRnm5d2WcZw3eRjN-cLajwTM0iF_o7OCPc+dkv+s-p3e9nLg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <54DD046B.3070507@riseup.net>
+From: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:02:10 +0100
+Message-ID: <CAAt2M18bXK_a3JVmnwC0rrVXwiz7iycgCnBYe1ALYXEab-V=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (natanael.l[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+ 0.5 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
+X-Headers-End: 1YLzy8-0007CF-L1
+Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:02:37 -0000
+
+On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Justus Ranvier
+<justusranvier@riseup.net> wrote:
+> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+> Hash: SHA256
+>
+> On 02/12/2015 07:47 PM, Allen Piscitello wrote:
+>> Nothing will stop that. Bitcoin needs to deal with those issues,
+>> not stick our heads in the sand and pretend they don't exist out of
+>> benevolence. This isn't a pet solution, but the rules of the
+>> protocol and what is realistically possible given the nature of
+>> distributed consensus. Relying on altruism is a recipe for
+>> failure.
+>
+> If there's a risk of fire burning down wooden buildings, pass out fire
+> extinguishers and smoke detectors, not matches.
+>
+> The latter makes one an arsonist.
+
+Controlled fires is a valid tactic when necessary to reduce harm. It
+is frequently used in areas with periods of extreme heat including
+Australia. By burning off grids, you isolate the majority of flammable
+matter into "islands". An accident fire would cause much more damage.
+
+Placing yourself in the way of the fire and asking them to find
+another solution isn't that bright. It is only a matter of time until
+a fire starts, controlled or not! If you want another solution, go
+figure one out yourself!
+
+More to the point, it is unreasonable to knowingly expose yourself to
+risk of harm and blame everybody else who isn't making your life
+easier without you having to change anything. If the majority decides
+that the best option to reduce harm for everybody requires that you
+move out of the way and find another way to do things, you're better
+off moving.
+
+Telling people it is fine to keep being careless when there's a fire
+hazard is "the real crime", because that would cause more harm than
+what those who try to get the system changed does.
+
+