diff options
| author | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> | 2011-06-16 13:59:56 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-06-16 18:00:02 +0000 |
| commit | dedcb5f890f356ad15978d7349c3900cef22caa1 (patch) | |
| tree | 7e0b554da4da901cc191a32fd537e308b4f91823 | |
| parent | 2e2ae841faaf718eaff720094e787eac63f7dba2 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-dedcb5f890f356ad15978d7349c3900cef22caa1.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-dedcb5f890f356ad15978d7349c3900cef22caa1.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development priorities
| -rw-r--r-- | 49/ec3503b5fbecad92faa991f175263f661d0b64 | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/49/ec3503b5fbecad92faa991f175263f661d0b64 b/49/ec3503b5fbecad92faa991f175263f661d0b64 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2edf89996 --- /dev/null +++ b/49/ec3503b5fbecad92faa991f175263f661d0b64 @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1QXGrK-0002Wz-Qv + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:00:02 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1QXGrJ-0002K7-QU + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:00:02 +0000 +Received: by iyb14 with SMTP id 14so1887527iyb.33 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.231.63.198 with SMTP id c6mr984267ibi.159.1308247196440; Thu, + 16 Jun 2011 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.231.19.203 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT) +X-Originating-IP: [99.173.148.118] +In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimZ5j7=1G89uRO9f7fHPdmDMpLMqg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <BANLkTimZ5j7=1G89uRO9f7fHPdmDMpLMqg@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:59:56 -0400 +Message-ID: <BANLkTimV+0mSqqmLYJeTdvxhM2PjtyXXMw@mail.gmail.com> +From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> +To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list +X-Headers-End: 1QXGrJ-0002K7-QU +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development priorities +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:00:02 -0000 + +On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gavin Andresen +<gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote: +> 1) Scaling-up issues, like disconnections when downloading the block chai= +n. +> +> 2) Wallet security. + +Agreed, though security professionals (and luke-jr) are already +pointing out the wallet crypto mainly eliminates a bit of bad PR, +rather than being a major crime deterrent. + +zooko on IRC had a pretty good suggestion: introduce a built-in +facility for air-gapped wallets (multiple wallets), so that loss of +your everyday transactional wallet does not mean loss of everything. + +You can do this manually, but we need something for all the people who +(a) don't know crypto, and (b) simply download and run the client +without thinking much about security. + + +> 3) Unit testing framework. =A0There was a PULL that had the start of +> boost unit tests; I think that is a critical need, along with a good +> suite of test cases. + +Three points, on testing: + +T1) autotools has a minimal testing framework built into it. "make +check" builds, and then runs tests. Each test is a program or script, +that returns 0 on success and 1 on failure. "make distcheck" builds, +runs tests, and then creates the distribution tarball if the tests +succeed. + +T2) I wouldn't narrow the focus to "unit tests", as stress tests and +other comprehensive, automated tests are quite useful as well + +but most importantly... + +T3) Don't hold v0.4 release for this. As we say in kernel-land, we +have a test lab called "the internet" Test suites have clear software +engineering value, but they largely "guard the past" -- making sure +you don't repeat past mistakes, rather than being a good indicator of +possible upcoming problems. The best testing is always in the field. +That always finds more problems than unit testing ever does. + +--=20 +Jeff Garzik +exMULTI, Inc. +jgarzik@exmulti.com + + |