diff options
| author | Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> | 2015-12-08 10:45:32 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-12-08 16:45:35 +0000 |
| commit | db759eed4a2ba4791d2ca0f67256f0f4dfc6e5e2 (patch) | |
| tree | 3af288bd5e07e637fb421f2e28d4c12b14780bb8 | |
| parent | cc58d39e945e253e8464d35fdc2f94609a967e44 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-db759eed4a2ba4791d2ca0f67256f0f4dfc6e5e2.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-db759eed4a2ba4791d2ca0f67256f0f4dfc6e5e2.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling by Partitioning
| -rw-r--r-- | f6/b43845f8b3871fca64a40b5d8f730cde004104 | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/f6/b43845f8b3871fca64a40b5d8f730cde004104 b/f6/b43845f8b3871fca64a40b5d8f730cde004104 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f358e6499 --- /dev/null +++ b/f6/b43845f8b3871fca64a40b5d8f730cde004104 @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC57BC7 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:45:35 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com + [209.85.213.169]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4233817F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by igl9 with SMTP id 9so99789111igl.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=4idl1jqSvJnr7HehADThtxOa8jYUO5XzwySCuNiUYZk=; + b=qi4yu/7Vfj1g0L8DMjcVUxEj/ymVITi/htDLmd0Kes1hOHNSxtREeKo/PD6YscFVCv + L4ssVWJfl5lIeVQEX/giczYHH5+4pnk9NFi7C9vFpLv+rl7Wa6LJLJU7XYFmpzBgLTNn + YgDyR1hnlHXcoKLtYDVGiLK8HGMq96TxHbi1varlu5CYcDqNDWWCc05bdQY1YStlzIfG + cmZ9MC+gJ0BzGTeO7z+xdImJPZIP1Ctfmx194Ff6sGMt29iQlHO6N17o+aYRV+veF28r + Ejmbc2H3ebMhB8zWs2wvyB/rF2pIY3I6knmFfp0q5X5JA0diFysFhB43hfBteqQKk7IP + GOuQ== +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Received: by 10.50.30.134 with SMTP id s6mr13217080igh.36.1449593132650; + Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.36.66.132 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <CABCnA7Wqz76m8qo5BYT41Z=hBH+fUfOc4xsFAGg=Niv7Jgkqsg@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CABCnA7Wqz76m8qo5BYT41Z=hBH+fUfOc4xsFAGg=Niv7Jgkqsg@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:32 -0600 +Message-ID: <CABaSBazMd4VYhSgM0-=DWU7_AAGxvXiW2yjsft4bKw8gAtpuNg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> +To: Akiva Lichtner <akiva.lichtner@gmail.com>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling by Partitioning +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:45:35 -0000 + +On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Akiva Lichtner via bitcoin-dev +<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> and miners would have to round-robin through partitions + +At first glance this proposal seems most similar to the sharding proposals: + +http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/sharding-the-blockchain/ +https://github.com/vbuterin/scalability_paper/blob/master/scalability.pdf +https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3u1m36/why_arent_we_as_a_community_talking_about/cxbamhn +http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1168.pdf (committee approach) + +> but clients would have to send more than one message in order to spend money + +Offloading work to the client for spends has in the past been a +well-received concept, such as the linearized coin history idea. + +- Bryan +http://heybryan.org/ +1 512 203 0507 + |