summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>2016-03-09 12:58:18 -0500
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2016-03-09 17:58:37 +0000
commitd91fcf7629f3c1be273144e62cb5881fac706996 (patch)
treed6656a62dea11cc114ab556b1686c60f9029d4cd
parentd1150d8c6b0d92f7337f9e38b3452362585569c8 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-d91fcf7629f3c1be273144e62cb5881fac706996.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-d91fcf7629f3c1be273144e62cb5881fac706996.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardfork to fix difficulty drop algorithm
-rw-r--r--6b/a60fef93b4d5a63f31b9af64e468ae9e33872a135
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/6b/a60fef93b4d5a63f31b9af64e468ae9e33872a b/6b/a60fef93b4d5a63f31b9af64e468ae9e33872a
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4bf2f612f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/6b/a60fef93b4d5a63f31b9af64e468ae9e33872a
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+Return-Path: <truthcoin@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412A2BED
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:58:37 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com
+ [209.85.220.173])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E6D10C
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:58:35 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id s68so23545653qkh.3
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Wed, 09 Mar 2016 09:58:35 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent
+ :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=phdi+LolBeBtBnCOp1nJM+cPJw+3AVs0tb53c0xe5Lc=;
+ b=zioA0O/STYYAYQGZu3JCeeGfjAcE9kTvFm+pAR6mpWOwbsvam+wetoLbucOvURS0si
+ BEzV99CjR9KNJPWO1Cp1mLDBCPuw3Mi6ZRg043pT69f0FCbEoxZhAcpOPVSeeVRgZ47g
+ NrxYyY8+5ln3QyOB5R9sSXDE3i3p377VmWGWYQIFUcpde43bhaipsexyeVYwTBkYi6jG
+ dUly8yMgCEkEs6UMWbNVdHhE/vvDOvI0nZc8jXl6z1xBj3B3eKxuHHCp+/6D2KJeBUQq
+ PkLiBiWFgohtaruXcRtEWEjEGk8+U59grgAlctb++QuRnh7Lwi64bt1bZSTyruumbxYW
+ yu0g==
+X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
+ d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
+ h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
+ :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
+ bh=phdi+LolBeBtBnCOp1nJM+cPJw+3AVs0tb53c0xe5Lc=;
+ b=btMFYjZjHSq1p4alPU26XBwc7+gfH/nWTFY0R5RbZ3r38SvLYM+ETLz0b5MCWcMwMm
+ u2RXDUE0U5KVkldnTq8D3SMPtMczmWik0GOR2W9wlAL2w9Wbg26i+pqmUiurjua5XCvx
+ ghGMh/0mkacGSFUfb0e9vsoYbUOj3B04nEyBJihNOIjnzEmZCoJKKBbRnh7P13u1uybP
+ hCQD4t8tShYP5M6jXqzlSe2IGGiUn3XyaM3KE/CaGkrQ4WKfsj956uM9BoVxLWh89gPu
+ uN075+xoayrw1Ay/JfdqIUAnShfoKq0HmTBVJAt5T4v4BaJc8UKR9FFZOqxpqQfYJelp
+ Vc2w==
+X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJE89wZapi9eAzwzz3o8bxNkyr9qRrLLxvaM6PdbZzhNzdCQMKYs+WYjkfXBrPQnw==
+X-Received: by 10.55.78.11 with SMTP id c11mr12643950qkb.89.1457546314318;
+ Wed, 09 Mar 2016 09:58:34 -0800 (PST)
+Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ool-4575fa8d.dyn.optonline.net.
+ [69.117.250.141]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
+ o67sm4123423qho.12.2016.03.09.09.58.32
+ (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
+ Wed, 09 Mar 2016 09:58:32 -0800 (PST)
+To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>, "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
+References: <201603021456.15820.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <20160302171418.GA5312@localhost.localdomain>
+ <CAAS2fgQVreFoLiHf8NhHLbT8wpSBO4WHHRU10q6Fe=3johhaoA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <56D78E13.2050403@gmail.com>
+From: Paul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>
+Message-ID: <56E0643A.8070201@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:58:18 -0500
+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
+ Thunderbird/38.5.1
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+In-Reply-To: <56D78E13.2050403@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
+ RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:06:22 +0000
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardfork to fix difficulty drop algorithm
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:58:37 -0000
+
+
+My recent conversations with miners revealed:
+
+* Many have made "extra-large" hardware investments recently.
+* Some wonder if we have just reached (or are quickly reaching) a
+plateau of hardware-efficiency. This would mean that
+hardware-investments might not be made in the critical period
+immediately preceding the halving.
+
+However, some good news:
+
+* For Chinese miners, power is often purchased in fixed quantities, for
+long-durations (of around 12 months, and these contracts -fortunately-
+do overlap the July halving). Because power is difficult to store, this
+implies that miners will *need* to mine, at all times, even at a loss.
+So miners may continue to mine after the halving, no matter what.
+
+On the other hand, miners can default on these contracts by simply
+declaring bankruptcy, at which point their equipment would be entirely
+unusable, by anyone, for a very long time.
+
+So the problem is less likely, but more potentially-catastrophic.
+
+Paul
+
+On 3/2/2016 8:06 PM, Paul Sztorc wrote:
+>
+> On 3/2/2016 12:53 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
+>> What you are proposing makes sense only if it was believed that a very=
+
+>> large difficulty drop would be very likely.
+>>
+>> This appears to be almost certainly untrue-- consider-- look how long
+>> ago since hashrate was 50% of what it is now, or 25% of what it is
+>> now-- this is strong evidence that supermajority of the hashrate is
+>> equipment with state of the art power efficiency.
+> I don't understand the relevance of this.
+>
+> In my view, we would prefer miners to invest in hardware just a mere
+> 2016 blocks away from the halving. Instead, they've made them too soon.=
+
+> Assuming that miners are already located in low-power-cost areas, the
+> difficulty will be quickly rising to compensate for "state of the art
+> power efficiency".
+>
+> So it will have canceled out by July.
+>
+> If anything, the more efficient miners become today, the bigger our
+> potential problem in July, because chip-manufacturers may have used up
+> all of the easy efficiency-increasing moves, such that investments do
+> not take place in June.
+>
+> Paul
+
+
+