+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]

+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)

+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)

+ (envelope-from <kristovatlas@gmail.com>) id 1Wd49n-00056l-TG

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:39 +0000

+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com

+ designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)

+ client-ip=209.85.216.171; envelope-from=kristovatlas@gmail.com;

+ helo=mail-qc0-f171.google.com;

+Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171])

+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)

+ (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd49m-0005d8-TR

+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;

+ Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:39 +0000

+Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c9so1563070qcz.16

+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;

+ Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)

+X-Received: by 10.229.96.199 with SMTP id i7mr24511193qcn.20.1398286353453;

+ Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:33 -0700 (PDT)

+Received: from [10.0.2.15] (c-50-191-76-100.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.

+ [50.191.76.100])

+ by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w14sm3731033qaw.11.2014.04.23.13.52.31

+ for <multiple recipients>

+ (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);

+ Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT)

+Message-ID: <5358280F.2050108@gmail.com>

+Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:52:31 -0400

+From: Kristov Atlas <kristovatlas@gmail.com>

+User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;

+ rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

+MIME-Version: 1.0

+To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>,

+ Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+References: <CAEz79PrAg=yydd3UOk51wGQUWey-KZHUH1Npzwb=qL+6zTj+pQ@mail.gmail.com> <53581D1D.1000709@gmail.com>

+ <CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>

+In-Reply-To: <CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com>

+Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

+ boundary="------------050406050105030801020907"

+X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)

+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.

+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for

+ sender-domain

+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider

+ (kristovatlas[at]gmail.com)

+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record

+ 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message

+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from

+ author's domain

+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,

+ not necessarily valid

+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

+X-Headers-End: 1Wd49m-0005d8-TR

+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Development Roadmap of Bitcoin Core 0.9.2

+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net

+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9

+Precedence: list

+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>

+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>

+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>

+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>

+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,

+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>

+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:52:40 -0000

+

+This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

+--------------050406050105030801020907

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+

+On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:

+> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kristov Atlas

+> <kristovatlas@gmail.com <mailto:kristovatlas@gmail.com>> wrote:

+>

+> I see that the latest nightly build (thanks for that, Warren) is

+> still not compatible with Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an

+> intention to address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?

+>

+>

+> If I understand the situation, bitcoind does work but not bitcoin-qt

+> due to qt-4.6? If that is so, then the official Bitcoin 0.8.6

+> binaries didn't work on Squeeze either this is not a regression.

+>

+> The priority is for bitcoind to work on as many distributions as

+> reasonably possible as older stable distributions are most often

+> headless. If you are a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an

+> incompatible system you can at least build it from source.

+>

+> Warren

+

+Bitcoin-Qt 0.8.6 worked fine on Tails (and Debian Squeeze, I assume).

+So, it is a regression.

+

+Here's output from the latest nightly build for Linux:

+

+amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$ ./bitcoin-qt

+./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol: _ZN19QAbstractProxyModel11setItemDataERK11QModelIndexRK4QMapIi8QVariantE

+

+Since Tails has many simple development tools like "make" stripped out

+for security reasons, one could not simply build from source in Tails.

+It might be possible to build in Debian Squeeze and transplant that,

+however. I'll have to give that a shot some time. I'd argue that Tails

+is an incredibly important -- and hardly obscure -- Linux distribution

+that Bitcoin should endeavour to support. See:

+https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html

+

+-Kristov

+

+--------------050406050105030801020907

+Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

+

+<html>

+ <head>

+ <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">

+ </head>

+ <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">

+ On 04/23/2014 04:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:<br>

+ <blockquote

+cite="mid:CAEz79Poy0XEVyC=nOdhYNVOASvfB-2zHJcjU2hvjA7iDWGDDyw@mail.gmail.com"

+ type="cite">

+ <div dir="ltr">

+ <div class="gmail_extra">

+ <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM,

+ Kristov Atlas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"

+ href="mailto:kristovatlas@gmail.com" target="_blank">kristovatlas@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>

+ wrote:<br>

+ <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0

+ .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

+ <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">

+ <div class="">I see that the latest nightly build

+ (thanks for that, Warren) is still not compatible with

+ Tails/Debian Squeeze. Is there still an intention to

+ address this issue? Might it be fixed by 0.9.2?<br>

+ </div>

+ </div>

+ </blockquote>

+ </div>

+ <br>

+ </div>

+ <div class="gmail_extra">If I understand the situation, bitcoind

+ does work but not bitcoin-qt due to qt-4.6?  If that is so,

+ then the official Bitcoin 0.8.6 binaries didn't work on

+ Squeeze either this is not a regression.</div>

+ <div class="gmail_extra"><br>

+ </div>

+ <div class="gmail_extra">The priority is for bitcoind to work on

+ as many distributions as reasonably possible as older stable

+ distributions are most often headless.  If you are a rare user

+ who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at

+ least build it from source.</div>

+ <div class="gmail_extra"><br>

+ </div>

+ <div class="gmail_extra">Warren</div>

+ </div>

+ </blockquote>

+ <br>

+ Bitcoin-Qt 0.8.6 worked fine on Tails (and Debian Squeeze, I

+ assume). So, it is a regression.<br>

+ <br>

+ Here's output from the latest nightly build for Linux:<br>

+ <pre><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$">amnesia@amnesia:~/bitcoin-0.9.99.0-20140422-2bbecc8-linux/bin/32$</a> ./bitcoin-qt

+./bitcoin-qt: symbol lookup error: ./bitcoin-qt: undefined symbol: _ZN19QAbstractProxyModel11setItemDataERK11QModelIndexRK4QMapIi8QVariantE</pre>

+ Since Tails has many simple development tools like "make" stripped

+ out for security reasons, one could not simply build from source in

+ Tails. It might be possible to build in Debian Squeeze and

+ transplant that, however. I'll have to give that a shot some time.

+ I'd argue that Tails is an incredibly important -- and hardly

+ obscure -- Linux distribution that Bitcoin should endeavour to

+ support. See: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html">https://tails.boum.org/press/index.en.html</a><br>

+ <br>

+ -Kristov<br>

+ </body>

+</html>

+

+--------------050406050105030801020907--

+

+