diff options
| author | Lautaro Dragan <lautarodragan@gmail.com> | 2018-08-05 18:11:26 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2018-08-05 21:11:40 +0000 |
| commit | d568b752cf1cc5214ae252e27e6ec3ecb994af2a (patch) | |
| tree | 3677f5cac3b3b3b5ff1b8e0cb6d11447d98da24b | |
| parent | 57793cfcb3d9cc470bc63f78f89ad78c0a04d8e9 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-d568b752cf1cc5214ae252e27e6ec3ecb994af2a.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-d568b752cf1cc5214ae252e27e6ec3ecb994af2a.zip | |
[bitcoin-dev] Claiming an OP_RETURN Prefix
| -rw-r--r-- | fb/92e34d1eb60c005db461de497ca376043c3fb1 | 121 |
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fb/92e34d1eb60c005db461de497ca376043c3fb1 b/fb/92e34d1eb60c005db461de497ca376043c3fb1 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80c22659b --- /dev/null +++ b/fb/92e34d1eb60c005db461de497ca376043c3fb1 @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +Return-Path: <lautarodragan@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4CB9F0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Aug 2018 21:11:40 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B98E61A0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 5 Aug 2018 21:11:39 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id o18-v6so12235870wmc.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Sun, 05 Aug 2018 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; + bh=ICvre3QPXqgpI0+wFjwS3DTc3UyxrSHh8bo6W9w9sGM=; + b=fbx8hgJDWE74V3fJuRqnvKhiJ9Sv1P0wQlkpYL7pDP6/wCUjkU4qb8nzt2zRurb94l + 2pvUr78VIs+iPiFuBILWbZ4Jz4WagYvWC8P7qtZnc/rTQHGmcHcE3ITadCaLNw9dpiRU + 7w8dUGZKJKSum/9SnSXaU3mN+yqT0rcXJyjuKNfB0SaOrDu8XhRu9NfpU08ck8pcvijk + eROaVPq2lEc30Vu0IZi7x8TEoHa3Yx/FQ0jvq+WYNiaJS/83sHryNYAv4jdoeoPyuQh/ + n4Fl/sJQrSQNqBOaV9sXXmUZzjFGJDBOlmMkjJaFQWkvDY/g4Y+f2uvwOyYqEZ4mL9C1 + /HGA== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id + :subject:to; + bh=ICvre3QPXqgpI0+wFjwS3DTc3UyxrSHh8bo6W9w9sGM=; + b=N7IVSSNnDmHRpgN0xU/k9lBZsXKRoZpSmMKO+DutWTiJMXCX3bABAhMNd39ce65rsl + jjyr4z1UaQVrhjzy/u4BLxLJVn9DYrt2Aa+/GAnhkae9cjSU9QL69gAXr9xhKa0GRZCW + /EYm6pcZzSXLsUDY3GfMmnryGcUW4HMZKJeQA7U84BBef46IiWuHGv+e2TeRMJjnH4gr + oxokB5/n4nZI5P8T0/j6WiC/YFydYMBdxhpJF9mEsALs6+Qp5mUfrcC6bWgbk5X0DZbp + LXsef6S6wCfg8J4j7domxJLDHu5DTGzvW5DnWaEI1xIRUIASV6UpboksfpO1We8DvBk+ + vPZA== +X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHA9pcEHyCRe1Fh5FaI0kGQ/Ooev8vkRRKjocjsNJZly8gZhHzF + 4cMMTmohiF1VuNhSXs4/oU6jFYJ6+LNIuOhVOWfYMQ== +X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpftr90YDA/WGvHe0xsBNADOrkmZREyPzaKvFEdlLaXKs/Kgp1kfzOcYzBTl3cC/EyNgf8yhjkTCRvh6ODyLT3E= +X-Received: by 2002:a1c:588c:: with SMTP id + m134-v6mr9610615wmb.154.1533503497908; + Sun, 05 Aug 2018 14:11:37 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Reply-To: lautaro.dragan@gmail.com +From: Lautaro Dragan <lautarodragan@gmail.com> +Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 18:11:26 -0300 +Message-ID: <CAK6DEspS1+LWwJgbVfWaM3gHwmhYPGBuV+dLPATe--QwmUUa2Q@mail.gmail.com> +To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,HTML_MESSAGE, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:21:43 +0000 +Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Claiming an OP_RETURN Prefix +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:11:40 -0000 + +--0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +Hi everyone, + +My name's Lautaro and I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po.et +<https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>. At Po.et we use +colored coins +<https://github.com/poetapp/node/blob/3c905bc5dbd3722ad39ac68041d9f2a099e5e84c/src/BlockchainWriter/ClaimController.ts#L101-L110> +to +store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET". + +I've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN entry of the bitcoin wiki +<https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=OP_RETURN&oldid=62560> that *protocols +wishing to claim OP_RETURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin +Improvement Proposals process*. + +That entry seems to have changed recently +<https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>, no longer +stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been able to +find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sake of +thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here. + +Should we actually be using the BIP process to claim a prefix? + +Thanks in advance, + +Lautaro + +--0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5 +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi everyone,<div><br></div><div>My name's Lautaro and = +I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of <a href=3D"https://en.bitcoin.it/w= +iki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes">Po.et</a>. At Po.et we <a href=3D"https:/= +/github.com/poetapp/node/blob/3c905bc5dbd3722ad39ac68041d9f2a099e5e84c/src/= +BlockchainWriter/ClaimController.ts#L101-L110">use colored coins</a>=C2=A0t= +o store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET".</div><= +div><br></div><div>I've read in an old version of <a href=3D"https://en= +.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=3DOP_RETURN&oldid=3D62560">the OP_RETURN = +entry of the bitcoin wiki</a> that=C2=A0<i>protocols wishing to claim OP_RE= +TURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin Improvement Proposals process= +</i>.</div><div><br></div><div>That entry seems to have <a href=3D"https://= +en.bitcoin.it/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes">changed recently</a>, no l= +onger stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been= + able to find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sa= +ke of thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here.<= +/div><div><br></div><div>Should we actually be using the BIP process to cla= +im a prefix?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks in advance,</div><div><br></di= +v><div>Lautaro</div></div> + +--0000000000004134cd0572b69bb5-- + |