diff options
| author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2015-06-12 19:44:51 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-06-12 18:45:04 +0000 |
| commit | c6e65a6523065a1dab8ab506e5453691d15227f9 (patch) | |
| tree | d7608f27111d4b8323ccac5b8128a6660eabbecc | |
| parent | 45aeeb9361656fb418b3c920fbf25d327f964485 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-c6e65a6523065a1dab8ab506e5453691d15227f9.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-c6e65a6523065a1dab8ab506e5453691d15227f9.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
| -rw-r--r-- | ef/22e86a993d2280ed7dbe07ef8551a63d7e7d61 | 127 |
1 files changed, 127 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ef/22e86a993d2280ed7dbe07ef8551a63d7e7d61 b/ef/22e86a993d2280ed7dbe07ef8551a63d7e7d61 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cebec327f --- /dev/null +++ b/ef/22e86a993d2280ed7dbe07ef8551a63d7e7d61 @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1Z3Twu-0006V7-0k + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:45:04 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org + designates 62.13.149.56 as permitted sender) + client-ip=62.13.149.56; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; + helo=outmail149056.authsmtp.com; +Received: from outmail149056.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.56]) + by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1Z3Twt-0008EN-0t for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:45:03 +0000 +Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) + by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5CIiuR0017677; + Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:44:56 +0100 (BST) +Received: from muck ([85.255.235.202]) (authenticated bits=128) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5CIiqwA098883 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); + Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:44:55 +0100 (BST) +Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:44:51 +0100 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name> +Message-ID: <20150612184450.GG19199@muck> +References: <20150612181153.GB19199@muck> <23144512.HX7dfatEFr@crushinator> + <20150612183421.GE19199@muck> <3287607.HcH18TyfSu@crushinator> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9sSKoi6Rw660DLir" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <3287607.HcH18TyfSu@crushinator> +X-Server-Quench: 1ec1edf7-1133-11e5-b396-002590a15da7 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aAdMdwAUEkAaAgsB AmMbWl1eVFl7XGU7 Yw9PbwBYfEhNWhto + UEpWR1pVCwQmRRly f0dfFWhyfg1OcH0+ bU9jXj5aCRd7IBIr + RVNVFG4FeGZhPWUC AkNRcR5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhES + HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA42BTMm Dw4FAThnHEtNTSE0 + JB89K0wRVFoRKEIv PltpV18VKHc8 +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 85.255.235.202/587 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record +X-Headers-End: 1Z3Twt-0008EN-0t +Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:45:04 -0000 + + +--9sSKoi6Rw660DLir +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:36:31PM -0400, Matt Whitlock wrote: +> On Friday, 12 June 2015, at 7:34 pm, Peter Todd wrote: +> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:22:36PM -0400, Matt Whitlock wrote: +> > > Why should miners only be able to vote for "double the limit" or "hal= +ve" the limit? If you're going to use bits, I think you need to use two bit= +s: +> > >=20 +> > > 0 0 =3D no preference ("wildcard" vote) +> > > 0 1 =3D vote for the limit to remain the same +> > > 1 0 =3D vote for the limit to be halved +> > > 1 1 =3D vote for the limit to be doubled +> > >=20 +> > > User transactions would follow the same usage. In particular, a user = +vote of "0 0" (no preference) could be included in a block casting any vote= +, but a block voting "0 0" (no preference) could only contain transactions = +voting "0 0" as well. +> >=20 +> > Sounds like a good encoding to me. Taking the median of the three +> > options, and throwing away "don't care" votes entirely, makes sense. +>=20 +> I hope you mean the *plurality* of the three options after throwing away = +the "don't cares," not the *median*. + +Median ensures that voting "no change" is meaningful. If "double" + "no +change" =3D 66%-1, you'd expect the result to be "no change", not "halve"" +With a plurality vote you'd end up with a halving that was supported by +a minority. + +--=20 +'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org +0000000000000000127ab1d576dc851f374424f1269c4700ccaba2c42d97e778 + +--9sSKoi6Rw660DLir +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVeyigXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw +MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxMjdhYjFkNTc2ZGM4NTFmMzc0NDI0ZjEyNjljNDcwMGNj +YWJhMmM0MmQ5N2U3NzgvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 +ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udx7lgf/ZB5EguYFakG2m6eC3n2CR9Ur +4NDPLUPpMmy2NByQ7KTWZD4ctuS80QYy8QPCA8VPA2w4/dCC26eqdpIjXnHkpDAa +Q7fMTxpGxngxO3vmm9mJvswxQ1CqFtY88qz+J0UMr4RWQb10lMcyMNHK9EsLPCiW +CcHnb7Mjemk7Y79utIkelyy47j/BaOaSPNlsgVo7NFTbPN4h8pO5pgUWqXit06SP +VMUsKjyTzbxmiQADhhco5MAqvjzDLcgrlCrP3HmdRvncPbaGqrR5Pk2ULbDk5Gzp +tjpqFD9glbgp79LObxY5WTbDB4dBQxZLIZUIpJtTLjq6+c5JiPrpTcVH2zyHjQ== +=Z04x +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--9sSKoi6Rw660DLir-- + + |