summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBtc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>2015-08-21 10:09:06 +0100
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-08-21 09:09:27 +0000
commitc59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79 (patch)
tree639382ee30d02ad098a87baaecee324942ff5c61
parent125884c11861fab2c5be9f50a63d3e9d1f701c99 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-c59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-c59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all BIPs on this website ?
-rw-r--r--58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466101
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466 b/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..96c2e28bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF487AA
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:27 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com (mail-yk0-f173.google.com
+ [209.85.160.173])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF02161
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by ykll84 with SMTP id l84so64162785ykl.0
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
+ :cc:content-type;
+ bh=PKDaam2EoMaDOOVxjZqrGuOYji+jM2izm2Igmr76sb8=;
+ b=xlMwiiSCAsF+A3hzqVm47H+CzIbcvXdHYYV+5JYi4rL4TM0KAuYcpEpIKEaOoX4cSe
+ GqSTbYvwYzAw1kApiPTjpqEgcVHlnHHoDviAenI2u6qs3Wzbbk3E8vpC88Qwo8TmHWCP
+ vktPicc3dyxkBQS5DJ1M0hSjqMRSs9TnhF1dUOQtaCfRymbZc/yBueDugGpJYTP83LCm
+ lW812mdrwIcGOckpyHssqTijnQ7OKA2vRfNzI1rUC6LOEP1tCCOMgodchu/ZT/MU4m8R
+ HGQhBeTk2NcwqoUb9QOq+l4TRLCeUl0vr/laZG1OSRVHzsYlco9cVHv7tQwPfjYmT1DP
+ OfNQ==
+X-Received: by 10.129.101.7 with SMTP id z7mr9219040ywb.81.1440148166160; Fri,
+ 21 Aug 2015 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.37.94.132 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
+In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnr=35TPycf3=0xn0gbkx=KfEZ36uY3nWEdK986n=dftSHA@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CA+1nnr=35TPycf3=0xn0gbkx=KfEZ36uY3nWEdK986n=dftSHA@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:09:06 +0100
+Message-ID: <CADJgMzsPkGTtTuTd0AFCeGz9u1A8+fx4+TMS34O-mNsExBkfRA@mail.gmail.com>
+To: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
+ HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all
+ BIPs on this website ?
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:27 -0000
+
+On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
+<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+> Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see
+> various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single
+> place.
+> This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are talking
+> about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.
+>
+> If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your
+> opinion veto or approval.
+> It is only to show what you would you "approve" and what you would "veto",
+> after your analysis.
+> Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to
+> your conclusion.
+>
+> You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as
+> new BIP get redacted.
+> I'm eager to include the new proposals.
+
+The most important part that developers should complete is the
+"Technical Opinion" column section where they can explain their
+general worldview, what their concerns are, how those concerns would
+be alleviated. If one is undecided or does not have enough information
+regarding each BIP then dont fill it out. That also helps signal the
+level of consensus for a proposal.
+
+As it stands at the moment, it's almost impossible to direct someone
+at the opinion of a specific developer other than hunting down a few
+gems scattered to the four corners of the universe. I tried recently
+and it was simply impossible. At least with this system, specific BIPs
+aside, we can easily see the view of each developer. I think most of
+us can comment on BIP101 since the BIP appears non-negotiable.
+
+The XT faction are easily winning the media war by obscuring rational
+debate by high signal to noise ratio. Nicolas' solution means the most
+important views expressed by each heavyweight will not get lost and
+serve as a good reference point for everyone, including the media.
+
+The site could be extended to include major stakeholders too like
+major service providers (think exchanges, wallet providers etc) and
+mining pools.
+