diff options
author | Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> | 2015-08-21 10:09:06 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-21 09:09:27 +0000 |
commit | c59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79 (patch) | |
tree | 639382ee30d02ad098a87baaecee324942ff5c61 | |
parent | 125884c11861fab2c5be9f50a63d3e9d1f701c99 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-c59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-c59fa732a499f9270c304ca6401e0dd8908cea79.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all BIPs on this website ?
-rw-r--r-- | 58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466 | 101 |
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466 b/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..96c2e28bc --- /dev/null +++ b/58/1a901e1762ba2fc53ade1c7f1d43b47b2a3466 @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF487AA + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:27 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com (mail-yk0-f173.google.com + [209.85.160.173]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF02161 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:26 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by ykll84 with SMTP id l84so64162785ykl.0 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc:content-type; + bh=PKDaam2EoMaDOOVxjZqrGuOYji+jM2izm2Igmr76sb8=; + b=xlMwiiSCAsF+A3hzqVm47H+CzIbcvXdHYYV+5JYi4rL4TM0KAuYcpEpIKEaOoX4cSe + GqSTbYvwYzAw1kApiPTjpqEgcVHlnHHoDviAenI2u6qs3Wzbbk3E8vpC88Qwo8TmHWCP + vktPicc3dyxkBQS5DJ1M0hSjqMRSs9TnhF1dUOQtaCfRymbZc/yBueDugGpJYTP83LCm + lW812mdrwIcGOckpyHssqTijnQ7OKA2vRfNzI1rUC6LOEP1tCCOMgodchu/ZT/MU4m8R + HGQhBeTk2NcwqoUb9QOq+l4TRLCeUl0vr/laZG1OSRVHzsYlco9cVHv7tQwPfjYmT1DP + OfNQ== +X-Received: by 10.129.101.7 with SMTP id z7mr9219040ywb.81.1440148166160; Fri, + 21 Aug 2015 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.37.94.132 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:09:06 -0700 (PDT) +In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnr=35TPycf3=0xn0gbkx=KfEZ36uY3nWEdK986n=dftSHA@mail.gmail.com> +References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CA+1nnr=35TPycf3=0xn0gbkx=KfEZ36uY3nWEdK986n=dftSHA@mail.gmail.com> +From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:09:06 +0100 +Message-ID: <CADJgMzsPkGTtTuTd0AFCeGz9u1A8+fx4+TMS34O-mNsExBkfRA@mail.gmail.com> +To: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, + HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all + BIPs on this website ? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:09:27 -0000 + +On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev +<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +> Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see +> various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single +> place. +> This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are talking +> about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums. +> +> If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your +> opinion veto or approval. +> It is only to show what you would you "approve" and what you would "veto", +> after your analysis. +> Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to +> your conclusion. +> +> You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as +> new BIP get redacted. +> I'm eager to include the new proposals. + +The most important part that developers should complete is the +"Technical Opinion" column section where they can explain their +general worldview, what their concerns are, how those concerns would +be alleviated. If one is undecided or does not have enough information +regarding each BIP then dont fill it out. That also helps signal the +level of consensus for a proposal. + +As it stands at the moment, it's almost impossible to direct someone +at the opinion of a specific developer other than hunting down a few +gems scattered to the four corners of the universe. I tried recently +and it was simply impossible. At least with this system, specific BIPs +aside, we can easily see the view of each developer. I think most of +us can comment on BIP101 since the BIP appears non-negotiable. + +The XT faction are easily winning the media war by obscuring rational +debate by high signal to noise ratio. Nicolas' solution means the most +important views expressed by each heavyweight will not get lost and +serve as a good reference point for everyone, including the media. + +The site could be extended to include major stakeholders too like +major service providers (think exchanges, wallet providers etc) and +mining pools. + |