summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAmir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>2012-02-29 09:02:29 -0800
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2012-02-29 17:02:42 +0000
commitc4dcb8d7c32de72d63928e162f3253d4d1fdb274 (patch)
treea6a3643ccc530919b901a7ded2cd9a9caf2f21c4
parent1f9cc81228af6ef624f7693ec731424733d19f43 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-c4dcb8d7c32de72d63928e162f3253d4d1fdb274.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-c4dcb8d7c32de72d63928e162f3253d4d1fdb274.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability
-rw-r--r--a4/e7bb0e17e60920816d16baf912b4af3e548c9f126
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/a4/e7bb0e17e60920816d16baf912b4af3e548c9f b/a4/e7bb0e17e60920816d16baf912b4af3e548c9f
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6a1c736bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/a4/e7bb0e17e60920816d16baf912b4af3e548c9f
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1S2mvK-0001EU-0I
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:02:42 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from nm30-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.252])
+ by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1S2mvE-0000sl-9B for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:02:41 +0000
+Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm30.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 29 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000
+Received: from [98.138.89.194] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 29 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000
+Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1052.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
+ 29 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5
+X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 914322.57462.bm@omp1052.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
+Received: (qmail 4193 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Feb 2012 17:02:29 -0000
+X-YMail-OSG: F1OYUs4VM1kGnHo5bVdVDjXrMJ1iYh.qG1gUGbe6ARKZfit
+ xJ3rTUT080Rn9Cd3lTD2MLEcEFpH6LAmTMqG_c6xJrZSOIfI5gt4P.OYDGnD
+ Umdq1MHFqA6ePmkfVF4_eHJFdPgTZcdZRkCBIQSaKlX3SKvcqFvmh6bcA6Fe
+ 4Vbs5879w6QMQvIRQ.o_tj6g2L2UZg8ZXQ0iQshRYLlpV0xoGJ1RQOP0VxtZ
+ IVd8Kf43I7r0Ku1ZIO3Vq1xb0zGiBiJqkHwyhcUWXAfTqrO5lXxMBX0rGr6O
+ b2a9pdeLDR0d5aOBQJHpFsoN3v3AIVD.yoGd3HZLdG08Smu7k0vh_lEbgdAU
+ vRFDEMEaJdczgT2T4RCQs8hLGLzS2fw9Hyk96EoTllYiN2TOGV6GiNAjG04M
+ ehfNNJWNFlWPJ85ph0pGd_d2pE8_IGxdr6ZgugmD0U10MHVxySDOtq820WzK
+ McbU9PZcmYJLk9aD5inibsvTrC7aDeMvkSWL010URAVp4uJ6d3Z9us8o2ZPB
+ 3Jlg30FwIxFsWyY6bTVGYlPVoLCmXh2FEdUWU_5QAjGV1QGLZjbKYJ36gtw- -
+Received: from [2.97.161.54] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
+ Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:02:29 PST
+X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.338427
+References: <CAPg+sBhb+gYMwp1OJuCHYt5=BU63=YBWOFaLLthHBkN_U-scaA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CANdZDc7c5D7YmAn7GUO+--9U2Z3Lz-CR9E-QsKriVeMoudeipA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <20120229164747.GA581@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
+Message-ID: <1330534949.81609.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:02:29 -0800 (PST)
+From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
+To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+In-Reply-To: <20120229164747.GA581@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
+ boundary="-1562933420-65607732-1330534949=:81609"
+X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
+ no trust [98.138.91.252 listed in list.dnswl.org]
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+ -0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
+X-Headers-End: 1S2mvE-0000sl-9B
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:02:42 -0000
+
+---1562933420-65607732-1330534949=:81609
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+
+I support BIP 30.
+
+I gave it a thought. The other ways of resolving this issue, all have various niggles. This is the best way.
+
+
+________________________________
+ From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
+To: Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn <zooko@zooko.com>
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:47 PM
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability
+
+On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
+> Could you spell out the attack explicitly? Presumably there aren't a
+> lot of people with the "malice energy" to perform the attack but not
+> to figure it out for themselves. I, however, have the "niceness
+> energy" to think about it for a few minutes but not to figure it out
+> for myself. If in your opinion it is realistically dangerous to post
+> it publicly, would you be so kind as to include me in the private
+> sharing of the explanation?
+
+It's not exactly a secret anymore, as the patch also references it.
+Russell O'Connor described the attack on his blog:
+http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html
+
+--
+Pieter
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
+Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
+also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
+http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
+_______________________________________________
+Bitcoin-development mailing list
+Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
+---1562933420-65607732-1330534949=:81609
+Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
+
+<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>I support BIP 30.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I gave it a thought. The other ways of resolving this issue, all have various niggles. This is the best way.</span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "> <div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Pieter Wuille &lt;pieter.wuille@gmail.com&gt;<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn &lt;zooko@zooko.com&gt; <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> Bitcoin Dev &lt;bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net&gt; <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday,
+ February 29, 2012 4:47 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Bitcoin-development] Duplicate transactions vulnerability<br> </font> </div> <br>
+On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:<br>&gt; Could you spell out the attack explicitly? Presumably there aren't a<br>&gt; lot of people with the "malice energy" to perform the attack but not<br>&gt; to figure it out for themselves. I, however, have the "niceness<br>&gt; energy" to think about it for a few minutes but not to figure it out<br>&gt; for myself. If in your opinion it is realistically dangerous to post<br>&gt; it publicly, would you be so kind as to include me in the private<br>&gt; sharing of the explanation?<br><br>It's not exactly a secret anymore, as the patch also references it.<br>Russell O'Connor described the attack on his blog:<br>http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html<br><br>-- <br>Pieter<br><br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Virtualization &amp; Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning<br>Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud
+ computing <br>also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.<br>http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/<br>_______________________________________________<br>Bitcoin-development mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>
+---1562933420-65607732-1330534949=:81609--
+
+