summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>2015-09-28 04:04:49 -0700
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2015-09-28 11:04:44 +0000
commitc3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e (patch)
tree50abe8216d26cb7efc0f73d1abc3e40766ea9823
parent697ee2fad245714852486a1299a2143cc49a2d26 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-c3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-c3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e.zip
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
-rw-r--r--0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c115
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c b/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a8daf18d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
+Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+ [172.17.192.35])
+ by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2EE17A3
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
+Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
+ [209.85.220.45])
+ by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7937D
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so75051843pab.3
+ for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
+ Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
+ :content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to:cc:message-id;
+ bh=7//MPPZvIut6WiUvDbfgueIxgGE2lp9/GRLbbInovE8=;
+ b=q71O5GUPbEralBbvK/UlDt1+72M2/OgJLnVOhNnEEX0RC2qq6ZzaO7/QsfKmUL9PQC
+ 4QGAk82kuJRlQYdqrSHwZwVpC6nDxSngcK8mCalKfgmJcF5rWvwkvl/JU54hN32xd0Oj
+ hvkA0vOSjLh/Je2cUlrnw4UU4puP6KyIfIhADnmozMelIeKInu+1nz/tRfMZ5QXy8q86
+ tcv2DUdgFploX2BbEoid9REmfvc/Eeyt5i4R05PaI2hKfOPSiYemKHUmWaoEzDF1B7eJ
+ fR95QJQNzOoJJafoaw7D9ZjEnbgOLEH3PNRUkpmp67UPXVdQUcb/4LHCeFZrr3nvKr0I
+ 7hFw==
+X-Received: by 10.66.142.202 with SMTP id ry10mr26482320pab.86.1443438283733;
+ Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
+ [76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
+ rb8sm18815240pab.14.2015.09.28.04.04.42
+ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
+ Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
+User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
+In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
+ <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
+ boundary="----K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:49 -0700
+To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>,
+ Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
+ Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
+Message-ID: <10248633-FD7B-4D07-B4A2-27EC5D0AC0D3@gmail.com>
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
+ DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
+ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
+X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
+ smtp1.linux-foundation.org
+Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 -0000
+
+------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+Content-Type: text/plain;
+ charset=UTF-8
+
+My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?
+
+On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
+>There is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It
+>will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV
+>wallets
+>will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that,
+>as
+>it's entirely avoidable.
+>
+>Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.
+>
+>Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:
+>
+>1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here
+>like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is
+>correctly
+>informed
+>
+>2) Do nothing
+>
+>
+>------------------------------------------------------------------------
+>
+>_______________________________________________
+>bitcoin-dev mailing list
+>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
+>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
+
+--
+Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
+------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF
+Content-Type: text/html;
+ charset=utf-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+<html><head></head><body>My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I&#39;m just not getting?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">There is <b>no</b> consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV wallets will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that, as it&#39;s entirely avoidable.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">1) Drop the &quot;everyone must agree to make changes&quot; idea that people here like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is correctly informed</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">2) Do nothing</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div>
+<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />bitcoin-dev mailing list<br />bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<br /><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
+-- <br>
+Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>
+------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF--
+
+