diff options
author | Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> | 2015-09-28 04:04:49 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-09-28 11:04:44 +0000 |
commit | c3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e (patch) | |
tree | 50abe8216d26cb7efc0f73d1abc3e40766ea9823 | |
parent | 697ee2fad245714852486a1299a2143cc49a2d26 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-c3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-c3efdcf3eef52bb658d720718b764824ec97c20e.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
-rw-r--r-- | 0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c b/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a8daf18d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/0c/e5b0f08727b3c255c161e36092e29f72f9015c @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2EE17A3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com + [209.85.220.45]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7937D + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:43 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by pablk4 with SMTP id lk4so75051843pab.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; + h=user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type + :content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to:cc:message-id; + bh=7//MPPZvIut6WiUvDbfgueIxgGE2lp9/GRLbbInovE8=; + b=q71O5GUPbEralBbvK/UlDt1+72M2/OgJLnVOhNnEEX0RC2qq6ZzaO7/QsfKmUL9PQC + 4QGAk82kuJRlQYdqrSHwZwVpC6nDxSngcK8mCalKfgmJcF5rWvwkvl/JU54hN32xd0Oj + hvkA0vOSjLh/Je2cUlrnw4UU4puP6KyIfIhADnmozMelIeKInu+1nz/tRfMZ5QXy8q86 + tcv2DUdgFploX2BbEoid9REmfvc/Eeyt5i4R05PaI2hKfOPSiYemKHUmWaoEzDF1B7eJ + fR95QJQNzOoJJafoaw7D9ZjEnbgOLEH3PNRUkpmp67UPXVdQUcb/4LHCeFZrr3nvKr0I + 7hFw== +X-Received: by 10.66.142.202 with SMTP id ry10mr26482320pab.86.1443438283733; + Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT) +Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com. + [76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id + rb8sm18815240pab.14.2015.09.28.04.04.42 + (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); + Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:43 -0700 (PDT) +User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android +In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com> +References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> + <CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; + boundary="----K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> +Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 04:04:49 -0700 +To: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>, + Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, + Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +Message-ID: <10248633-FD7B-4D07-B4A2-27EC5D0AC0D3@gmail.com> +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:04:44 -0000 + +------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset=UTF-8 + +My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting? + +On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: +>There is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It +>will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV +>wallets +>will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that, +>as +>it's entirely avoidable. +> +>Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped. +> +>Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things: +> +>1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here +>like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is +>correctly +>informed +> +>2) Do nothing +> +> +>------------------------------------------------------------------------ +> +>_______________________________________________ +>bitcoin-dev mailing list +>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev + +-- +Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. +------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF +Content-Type: text/html; + charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +<html><head></head><body>My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">There is <b>no</b> consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV wallets will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that, as it's entirely avoidable.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is correctly informed</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">2) Do nothing</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div></div> +<p style="margin-top: 2.5em; margin-bottom: 1em; border-bottom: 1px solid #000"></p><pre class="k9mail"><hr /><br />bitcoin-dev mailing list<br />bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<br /><a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br> +-- <br> +Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html> +------K2XHMH7BJOG79D2F9JZZ0RFBKDRHUF-- + + |