summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>2011-12-13 11:48:31 -0500
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2011-12-13 16:48:44 +0000
commitbf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98 (patch)
tree705aded2fbda0f838b6ccace6bde52ed91c4eed8
parent05b74dddc1dbbfedea697e455d41db66de83d95e (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-bf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-bf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases
-rw-r--r--64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf899
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8 b/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3f1b957f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1RaVX2-0004Lo-85
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 +0000
+Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
+ designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender)
+ client-ip=209.85.215.175; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
+ helo=mail-ey0-f175.google.com;
+Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175])
+ by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
+ (Exim 4.76) id 1RaVWw-0005pQ-Pl
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 +0000
+Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so2177070eaa.34
+ for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
+ Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:32 -0800 (PST)
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.204.156.216 with SMTP id y24mr7903772bkw.80.1323794912508;
+ Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:32 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.204.229.145 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:31 -0800 (PST)
+In-Reply-To: <CACwuEiNO=pSfgD415-5=HnaXdXbZ++Ps0n4cyjckLRRP-tJemA@mail.gmail.com>
+References: <1323731781.42953.YahooMailClassic@web120920.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <CAGQP0AGvq603oshSGiP79A+gqDqW_hHG+qZjaZccCmo+gd3W2A@mail.gmail.com>
+ <201112121841.39864.luke@dashjr.org>
+ <CAGQP0AGBKKEqhaJZj-Rw400AjrVHE9_EMve=RWdqoaOaDsTgtw@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CAGQP0AGY32QP=rXyGftb5NbHA7fhcCne7W=pt5+onXp1Jbm98Q@mail.gmail.com>
+ <1323736946.58149.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
+ <CANEZrP1oPaqAT+LCfrAXO9WBz+oC2uvbP=5vx2+DX2P0qFusgA@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CALxbBHUgCOVMRxtnsmC2W-MaYfeDSzaftWMCCgcWsMBdZfzPQg@mail.gmail.com>
+ <CACwuEiNO=pSfgD415-5=HnaXdXbZ++Ps0n4cyjckLRRP-tJemA@mail.gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:48:31 -0500
+Message-ID: <CABsx9T3g=27QwQaoBKKJ2ckZhOUVMokRYNDq9yRXfGzVQOuFJg@mail.gmail.com>
+From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
+To: Walter Stanish <walter@stani.sh>
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
+X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
+ sender-domain
+ 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
+ (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
+ -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
+ author's domain
+ 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
+ not necessarily valid
+ -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
+X-Headers-End: 1RaVWw-0005pQ-Pl
+Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
+ <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 -0000
+
+RE: IIBAN numbers:
+
+Nifty! Thanks for the pointers, I think we should avoid reinventing
+wheels whenever possible.
+
+When composing my last response in this thread I wrote, and then erased:
+
+"There doesn't have to be one solution: I'd like to see some
+experimentation, with clients supporting different schemes for bitcoin
+address aliases, and maybe supporting plugins to extend the schemes
+supported (a plugin would take a string, do some
+behind-the-scenes-magic, and return a bitcoin address or public key)."
+
+Defining Bitcoin as an IIBAN "institution", with 36^6 "accounts",
+seems like a forward-thinking idea, although I'm not clear on exactly
+how those 2.2billion "accounts" would get allocated and mapped into
+bitcoin addresses.
+
+I imagine some central organization that maps IIBAN account numbers to
+domain names... and then clients (or plugins in the clients) query
+that trusted central organization and then the account holder's domain
+to get a (possibly unique) public key or bitcoin address.
+
+As long as IIBANs are not the ONLY way of aliasing bitcoin addresses
+to more-human-friendly strings I think that would be a fine way to do
+it.
+
+--
+--
+Gavin Andresen
+
+