diff options
author | Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> | 2011-12-13 11:48:31 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2011-12-13 16:48:44 +0000 |
commit | bf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98 (patch) | |
tree | 705aded2fbda0f838b6ccace6bde52ed91c4eed8 | |
parent | 05b74dddc1dbbfedea697e455d41db66de83d95e (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-bf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-bf33d35353c8551e2956d066d171537ce7162d98.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases
-rw-r--r-- | 64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8 | 99 |
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8 b/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3f1b957f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/64/252f68c2af1a5995611c0ae5562d06a790caf8 @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1RaVX2-0004Lo-85 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com + designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) + client-ip=209.85.215.175; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; + helo=mail-ey0-f175.google.com; +Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) + by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) + (Exim 4.76) id 1RaVWw-0005pQ-Pl + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 +0000 +Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so2177070eaa.34 + for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; + Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:32 -0800 (PST) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Received: by 10.204.156.216 with SMTP id y24mr7903772bkw.80.1323794912508; + Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:32 -0800 (PST) +Received: by 10.204.229.145 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:31 -0800 (PST) +In-Reply-To: <CACwuEiNO=pSfgD415-5=HnaXdXbZ++Ps0n4cyjckLRRP-tJemA@mail.gmail.com> +References: <1323731781.42953.YahooMailClassic@web120920.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <CAGQP0AGvq603oshSGiP79A+gqDqW_hHG+qZjaZccCmo+gd3W2A@mail.gmail.com> + <201112121841.39864.luke@dashjr.org> + <CAGQP0AGBKKEqhaJZj-Rw400AjrVHE9_EMve=RWdqoaOaDsTgtw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAGQP0AGY32QP=rXyGftb5NbHA7fhcCne7W=pt5+onXp1Jbm98Q@mail.gmail.com> + <1323736946.58149.YahooMailNeo@web121001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> + <CANEZrP1oPaqAT+LCfrAXO9WBz+oC2uvbP=5vx2+DX2P0qFusgA@mail.gmail.com> + <CALxbBHUgCOVMRxtnsmC2W-MaYfeDSzaftWMCCgcWsMBdZfzPQg@mail.gmail.com> + <CACwuEiNO=pSfgD415-5=HnaXdXbZ++Ps0n4cyjckLRRP-tJemA@mail.gmail.com> +Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:48:31 -0500 +Message-ID: <CABsx9T3g=27QwQaoBKKJ2ckZhOUVMokRYNDq9yRXfGzVQOuFJg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +To: Walter Stanish <walter@stani.sh> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider + (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from + author's domain + 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, + not necessarily valid + -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature +X-Headers-End: 1RaVWw-0005pQ-Pl +Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" + <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:44 -0000 + +RE: IIBAN numbers: + +Nifty! Thanks for the pointers, I think we should avoid reinventing +wheels whenever possible. + +When composing my last response in this thread I wrote, and then erased: + +"There doesn't have to be one solution: I'd like to see some +experimentation, with clients supporting different schemes for bitcoin +address aliases, and maybe supporting plugins to extend the schemes +supported (a plugin would take a string, do some +behind-the-scenes-magic, and return a bitcoin address or public key)." + +Defining Bitcoin as an IIBAN "institution", with 36^6 "accounts", +seems like a forward-thinking idea, although I'm not clear on exactly +how those 2.2billion "accounts" would get allocated and mapped into +bitcoin addresses. + +I imagine some central organization that maps IIBAN account numbers to +domain names... and then clients (or plugins in the clients) query +that trusted central organization and then the account holder's domain +to get a (possibly unique) public key or bitcoin address. + +As long as IIBANs are not the ONLY way of aliasing bitcoin addresses +to more-human-friendly strings I think that would be a fine way to do +it. + +-- +-- +Gavin Andresen + + |