diff options
| author | Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> | 2015-08-24 17:37:51 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-08-24 17:37:54 +0000 |
| commit | be9e45a89513c3d249ff48f5fd50f6ba435c73c1 (patch) | |
| tree | 617484d5f13c3ce7d8c6b61b82bf31a5601583c5 | |
| parent | 8c425f1cd30aa244bb76cfc694eea4b3c9bc5ea3 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-be9e45a89513c3d249ff48f5fd50f6ba435c73c1.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-be9e45a89513c3d249ff48f5fd50f6ba435c73c1.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
| -rw-r--r-- | 60/fcb798e471549712d1f93559cbb3f6e74a0a2f | 66 |
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/60/fcb798e471549712d1f93559cbb3f6e74a0a2f b/60/fcb798e471549712d1f93559cbb3f6e74a0a2f new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9a3fc2909 --- /dev/null +++ b/60/fcb798e471549712d1f93559cbb3f6e74a0a2f @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382FBBBC + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:37:54 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail.bluematt.me (mail.bluematt.me [192.241.179.72]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFCB812E + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:37:53 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from [172.17.0.1] (gw.vpn.bluematt.me [162.243.132.6]) + by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7843F560E5; + Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:37:52 +0000 (UTC) +To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com> +References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com> + <20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com> +From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> +Message-ID: <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> +Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:37:51 +0000 +User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 + Thunderbird/38.1.0 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +In-Reply-To: <20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham + version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:37:54 -0000 + +Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen +which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that +it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is +distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but +not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some +proposals may make this more useful in the future)"? + +Matt + +On 08/24/15 15:29, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: +>> NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise +>> NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK (eg for nodes running in pruned mode +>> which, nonetheless, provide filtered access to the data which they do have). +> +> But is this useful without having decided on a way to signal which blocks pruned nodes do have? +> +> It looks like the part between paranthesis is speculation and should be left to a future BIP. +> +> Wladimir +> + |