diff options
| author | jl2012 <jl2012@xbt.hk> | 2016-02-10 12:26:03 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2016-02-10 04:25:40 +0000 |
| commit | bd81d46dbde198a4307a4e71a028ce32b3da6b15 (patch) | |
| tree | 7f10c237b94ad5df4900f4a5810c06434cbeb83f | |
| parent | bfd781379cf661cdd06846516de1f1017493c454 (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-bd81d46dbde198a4307a4e71a028ce32b3da6b15.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-bd81d46dbde198a4307a4e71a028ce32b3da6b15.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] A roadmap to a better header format and bigger block size
| -rw-r--r-- | a8/1b6b7dbf972b25e0c93c7c74559aa5adcc9c64 | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/a8/1b6b7dbf972b25e0c93c7c74559aa5adcc9c64 b/a8/1b6b7dbf972b25e0c93c7c74559aa5adcc9c64 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e8d57753c --- /dev/null +++ b/a8/1b6b7dbf972b25e0c93c7c74559aa5adcc9c64 @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +Return-Path: <jl2012@xbt.hk> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D96F0F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:25:40 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from s47.web-hosting.com (s47.web-hosting.com [199.188.200.16]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CDE17F + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:25:40 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from 119246245241.ctinets.com ([119.246.245.241]:60604 helo=2012R2) + by server47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa + (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) + (envelope-from <jl2012@xbt.hk>) + id 1aTMLS-001YFy-4H; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:25:38 -0500 +From: <jl2012@xbt.hk> +To: "'Matt Corallo'" <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>, + <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +References: <239b01d16344$717712d0$54653870$@xbt.hk> + <56BA64F3.2060900@mattcorallo.com> +In-Reply-To: <56BA64F3.2060900@mattcorallo.com> +Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:26:03 +0800 +Message-ID: <23ab01d163bb$28e140a0$7aa3c1e0$@xbt.hk> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset="US-ASCII" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 +Thread-Index: AQHGHiFSfOL5uUJrxN+FpKFqqUC6GQE+7KHLnzFAe8A= +Content-Language: en-hk +X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, + please include it with any abuse report +X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server47.web-hosting.com +X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] +X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - xbt.hk +X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server47.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: + jl2012@xbt.hk +X-Authenticated-Sender: server47.web-hosting.com: jl2012@xbt.hk +X-Source: +X-Source-Args: +X-Source-Dir: +X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE + autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A roadmap to a better header format and bigger + block size +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:25:40 -0000 + +I am actually suggesting 1 hardfork, not 2. However, different rules are +activated at different time to enhance safety and reduce disruption. The +advantage is people are required to upgrade once, not twice. Any clients +designed for stage 2 should also be ready for stage 3. + + +-----Original Message----- +From: Matt Corallo [mailto:lf-lists@mattcorallo.com] +Sent: Wednesday, 10 February, 2016 06:15 +To: jl2012@xbt.hk; bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A roadmap to a better header format and bigger +block size + +As for your stages idea, I generally like the idea (and mentioned it may be +a good idea in my proposal), but am worried about scheduling two hard-forks +at once....Lets do our first hard-fork first with the things we think we +will need anytime in the visible future that we have reasonable designs for +now, and talk about a second one after we've seen what did/didnt blow up +with the first one. + +Anyway, this generally seems reasonable - it looks like most of this matches +up with what I said more specifically in my mail yesterday, with the +addition of timewarp fixes, which we should probably add, and Luke's header +changes, which I need to spend some more time thinking about. + +Matt + + + |