diff options
| author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2015-05-07 13:42:20 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2015-05-07 17:42:34 +0000 |
| commit | bd345fe07069a4a70c8589ea1702bacdf26303df (patch) | |
| tree | d961648ef100451a09735442192009edd1348d1c | |
| parent | 71b4a383d1c752498f95dbada7dcc6d14eab219e (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-bd345fe07069a4a70c8589ea1702bacdf26303df.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-bd345fe07069a4a70c8589ea1702bacdf26303df.zip | |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
| -rw-r--r-- | 87/63af9293bf7df5d53b1f5613ea850a53e96fc5 | 138 |
1 files changed, 138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/87/63af9293bf7df5d53b1f5613ea850a53e96fc5 b/87/63af9293bf7df5d53b1f5613ea850a53e96fc5 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d4918a803 --- /dev/null +++ b/87/63af9293bf7df5d53b1f5613ea850a53e96fc5 @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1YqPog-0008EP-Qz + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 07 May 2015 17:42:34 +0000 +Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org + designates 62.13.148.93 as permitted sender) + client-ip=62.13.148.93; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; + helo=outmail148093.authsmtp.net; +Received: from outmail148093.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.93]) + by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1YqPof-0005Yf-Bu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Thu, 07 May 2015 17:42:34 +0000 +Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) + by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t47HgQ1l002246; + Thu, 7 May 2015 18:42:26 +0100 (BST) +Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com + [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t47HgLmQ035138 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); + Thu, 7 May 2015 18:42:23 +0100 (BST) +Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:42:20 -0400 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> +Message-ID: <20150507174220.GC6033@savin.petertodd.org> +References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me> + <CANEZrP3wGWHdz+ut6pvke5TJJsc1rTFt8sn2KziX35oL5LAsyg@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDpDvk2VsQ+mJ-BoeBKmvu9jBXNujZEFKuCStRNjFL6VOA@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP2zAGCCBhNa4=9yw+A_Dn5o4SQXoPTE_qcJzZ1dFuF2tw@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDqd6iHRUDKZWWTudcC1QkYa+rCuHjz7pMC2K1Db8wpgfA@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP1CU0kB0vXeXUX1L8byaT-Zf2xg+3N+GeNthi_i6bn1qw@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDpgBNjuPLnFiU2TspgLws7JjWnsxih09JG9bQycraS=sQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CANEZrP1ay64jryeUyDJ9Y+1C-Bre1U_1xMyuB4cqQprd1-qbCA@mail.gmail.com> + <CABm2gDq12a8p8+fB14nM5S8CVz=sdESMowZJUeKBwvx16WDSDQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CABsx9T1nwastEoN12B2Y-TA2V1fYtDcm9-nkiOQNVhXmbCjcGQ@mail.gmail.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1nwastEoN12B2Y-TA2V1fYtDcm9-nkiOQNVhXmbCjcGQ@mail.gmail.com> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) +X-Server-Quench: 6b9fa1d5-f4e0-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aQdMdgUUFVQNAgsB AmMbWlxeVF97W2c7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr + VklWR1pVCwQmRRgG fkliD3hydABHe3Y+ ZENiW3YVWhZzIxd8 + FktJQ2lTZXphaTUb TUkOcAdJcANIexZF O1F8UScOLwdSbGoL + NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDNDo7 TBNKJjQ9EAUkQS4p IhU9JzYB +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for + sender-domain + -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record + -0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address +X-Headers-End: 1YqPof-0005Yf-Bu +Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 17:42:34 -0000 + + +--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:59:13PM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: +> Fee dynamics seems to come up over and over again in these discussions, +> with lots of talk and theorizing. +>=20 +> I hope some data on what is happening with fees right now might help, so I +> wrote another blog post (with graphs, which can't be done in a mailing li= +st +> post): +> http://gavinandresen.ninja/the-myth-of-not-full-blocks +>=20 +> We don=E2=80=99t need 100% full one megabyte blocks to start to learn abo= +ut what is +> likely to happen as transaction volume rises and/or the one megabyte block +> size limit is raised. + +Sounds like you're saying we are bumping up against a 1MB limit. However +other than the occasional user who has sent a transaction with an +extremely low/no fee, what evidence do we have that this is or is not +actually impacting meaningful usage form the user's point of view? + +Do we have evidence as to how users are coping? e.g. do they send time +sensitive transactiosn with higher fees? Are people conciously moving +low value transactions off the blockchain? Equally, what about the story +with companies? You of course are an advisor to Coinbase, and could give +us some insight into the type of planning payment processors/wallets are +doing. For instance, does Coinbase have any plans to work with other +wallet providers/payment processors to aggregate fund transfers between +wallet providers - an obvious payment channel application. + +--=20 +'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org +00000000000000000232164c96eaa6bf7cbc3dc61ea055840715b5a81ee8f6be + +--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4 +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVS6P4XhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw +MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxNjg1NTc0MDY4NDNhZDUxNDBiN2JhMTJiOWNjMTZjZDhm +YzkxOThjZTY3MGRlNDgvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 +ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfuo0QgAtzxTANu/W0EUNDmwuQDd8NEY +DOD9Bo0Ut7R+nPfj0L+Kv5J+sQeIS/xT01/k82+ypR8/5VD/Pwy8UoGpeDPLuI2/ +FgxP0DQXZQUuic6DAsAV8JodNkjhxQ+PHvA7H1pVw8aMpe952QV68w7MhpwEmgvF +AJv+XEZXNir2f3nrBZ3guLrmxAG4ki136uyfoZtge3Bu7ydMAoqnvqBodAHE71+e +1zSGaJQo/Zi7MgHHnR6cMJ47HBSs9Swug/lM/NtsXyDMineccQ96aIPIi19Hy0io +/WmbVCNC5CF9Sh0UZEm1Vb20vyueqsFWTJJUQZl5D9etqNniW/ARJ6J6QkxaSQ== +=RS/j +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--L6iaP+gRLNZHKoI4-- + + |