diff options
author | Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> | 2012-05-25 00:45:13 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2012-05-25 00:45:51 +0000 |
commit | bb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2 (patch) | |
tree | 563ab95c9e213b349e5fd164f7f32e2e0838ce7c | |
parent | b70bc639fd8d1ebbf98b627fb66b5f44a1a4c527 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-bb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-bb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2.zip |
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?
-rw-r--r-- | 7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62 | 61 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62 b/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c2bb4ff2d --- /dev/null +++ b/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62 @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] + helo=mx.sourceforge.net) + by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + (envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1SXif9-0005zw-E3 + for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 +0000 +X-ACL-Warn: +Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) + by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) + id 1SXif4-0007On-8q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; + Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 +0000 +Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [97.96.85.141]) + (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) + by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB4A556054F; + Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:37 +0000 (UTC) +From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org> +To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:13 +0000 +User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoonestfix-intelwr; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; + ; ) +References: <CA+8xBpdBe4yR6xkCODL6JQ41Gyx9eWcGGGvcQVt7DCmaEnAhbg@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpdBe4yR6xkCODL6JQ41Gyx9eWcGGGvcQVt7DCmaEnAhbg@mail.gmail.com> +X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F +X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F +X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: Text/Plain; + charset="iso-8859-1" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Message-Id: <201205250045.24540.luke@dashjr.org> +X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) +X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. + See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. + -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay + domain +X-Headers-End: 1SXif4-0007On-8q +Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks? +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 +Precedence: list +List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, + <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 -0000 + +On Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:33:12 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: +> Comments? It wouldn't be a problem if these no-TX blocks were not +> already getting frequent (1 in 20). + +FWIW, based on statistics for Eligius's past 100 blocks, it seems 10% (1 in +10) of 1-txn blocks is not actually unreasonable. This also means these 1-txn +mined blocks are not necessarily harming Bitcoin intentionally. Anyone care to +figure out the math for how fast miners need to finish processing transactions +to reduce the number of 1txn blocks? + + |