summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLuke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>2012-05-25 00:45:13 +0000
committerbitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org>2012-05-25 00:45:51 +0000
commitbb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2 (patch)
tree563ab95c9e213b349e5fd164f7f32e2e0838ce7c
parentb70bc639fd8d1ebbf98b627fb66b5f44a1a4c527 (diff)
downloadpi-bitcoindev-bb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2.tar.gz
pi-bitcoindev-bb26e7d6416a09d703476b1a9f9afbcb0cf02cb2.zip
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?
-rw-r--r--7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae6261
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62 b/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c2bb4ff2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7d/b6d63d465161438450593d3ace1e23bb43ae62
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
+ helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
+ by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ (envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1SXif9-0005zw-E3
+ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 +0000
+X-ACL-Warn:
+Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
+ by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
+ id 1SXif4-0007On-8q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
+ Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 +0000
+Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [97.96.85.141])
+ (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
+ by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB4A556054F;
+ Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
+From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
+To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:13 +0000
+User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.12-gentoonestfix-intelwr; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64;
+ ; )
+References: <CA+8xBpdBe4yR6xkCODL6JQ41Gyx9eWcGGGvcQVt7DCmaEnAhbg@mail.gmail.com>
+In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpdBe4yR6xkCODL6JQ41Gyx9eWcGGGvcQVt7DCmaEnAhbg@mail.gmail.com>
+X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
+X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
+X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: Text/Plain;
+ charset="iso-8859-1"
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Message-Id: <201205250045.24540.luke@dashjr.org>
+X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
+X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
+ See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
+ -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
+ domain
+X-Headers-End: 1SXif4-0007On-8q
+Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Punishing empty blocks?
+X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
+List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
+List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
+List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
+ <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:45:51 -0000
+
+On Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:33:12 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
+> Comments? It wouldn't be a problem if these no-TX blocks were not
+> already getting frequent (1 in 20).
+
+FWIW, based on statistics for Eligius's past 100 blocks, it seems 10% (1 in
+10) of 1-txn blocks is not actually unreasonable. This also means these 1-txn
+mined blocks are not necessarily harming Bitcoin intentionally. Anyone care to
+figure out the math for how fast miners need to finish processing transactions
+to reduce the number of 1txn blocks?
+
+